|
metadata

**Guild Rumble #78: May 20 - 25, 2021**
Active BGE: Rich
If you have new feedback that you would like to post, please use this thread.
Good luck, everyone!
|
|
|
metadata
Feedback isn't necessarily new. . . but I think I speak on behalf of all guilds, guild leaders, officers, and general players- that these nukes are destroying your game and you guys need to get a handle on it like five rumbles ago
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[travisleeccain](/forums/726779/topics/1942609?page=1#13636422):**_
> Feedback isn't necessarily new but I think I speak on behalf of all guilds guild leaders officers and general players that these nukes are destroying your game and you guys need to get a handle on it like five rumbles ago
+1!!!!
|
|
|
metadata
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
|
|
|
metadata
Game insecurity make event bad.
|
|
|
metadata
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
|
|
|
metadata
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
|
|
|
metadata
It seems at this stage the decision has been made that it's less costly and time consuming for Kong/ Synapse to reimburse players for lost rewards and rumble ranks than it is for them to fix the security flaws within the game. I don't expect this to change any time soon.
|
|
|
metadata
We do hear your feedback and are most definitely working to resolve the issues and not simply writing them off as has been insinuated by some. We care deeply about maintaining a fun and safe place to play. Thank you for your thoughts and we will continue working diligently to fix the issues.
However, please avoid posting opionion as factual statements. Doing so will result in moderation. We wish to avoid having to moderate critical feedback, so we just ask that everyone makes sure they are careful with how it is phrased. Thanks!
|
|
|
metadata
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
|
|
|
metadata
How is it destroying the game? You all still play....?
|
|
|
metadata
This post has been removed by an administrator or moderator
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[BeardedOrange](/forums/727066/topics/1942609?page=1#13636616)**:*
> We do hear your feedback and are most definitely working to resolve the issues and not simply writing them off as has been insinuated by some. We care deeply about maintaining a fun and safe place to play. Thank you for your thoughts and we will continue working diligently to fix the issues.
>
> However, please avoid posting opionion as factual statements. Doing so will result in moderation. We wish to avoid having to moderate critical feedback, so we just ask that everyone makes sure they are careful with how it is phrased. Thanks!
Lol. Censoring people for criticizing how Kong is handling the game‘s security is definitely a sign things are going swimmingly.
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[Lance_1993](/forums/726779/topics/1942609?page=1#13636744):**_
> > *Originally posted by **[BeardedOrange](/forums/727066/topics/1942609?page=1#13636616)**:*
> > We do hear your feedback and are most definitely working to resolve the issues and not simply writing them off as has been insinuated by some. We care deeply about maintaining a fun and safe place to play. Thank you for your thoughts and we will continue working diligently to fix the issues.
> >
> > However, please avoid posting opionion as factual statements. Doing so will result in moderation. We wish to avoid having to moderate critical feedback, so we just ask that everyone makes sure they are careful with how it is phrased. Thanks!
>
> Lol. Censoring people for criticizing how Kong is handling the game‘s security is definitely a sign things are going swimmingly.
The trick is to criticise without being offensive. It is possible, but difficult when tempers flare.
|
|
|
metadata
BO didn’t say it had to do with offensiveness. He said you shouldn’t post “opinions” as “factual statements.”
Quite a bit different.
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[Lance_1993](/forums/727066/topics/1942609?page=1#13636954)**:*
> BO didn’t say it had to do with offensiveness. He said you shouldn’t post “opinions” as “factual statements.”
>
> Quite a bit different.
You are right, I did not specifically list out all of the different rules that may result in moderation within this thread. I touched upon one of the bigger points I saw happen specifically within this thread. For the complete list of rules, please make sure to read through the pinned rules thread as those do still apply to all threads. Apologies if my previous comment caused any confusion.
|