|
metadata
When I try to filter the combos on a character card (e.g. to look at just the artistic combos), nothing happens when I click 'Apply'. I just remain on the filter screen until I close it, and the filter does not apply. The problem started happening yesterday. Any idea what I'm doing wrong??
More details: for some reason, I am able to filter the combos for Jeff and Snot, but only those 2. Doesn't work for any of my other American Dad cards (or cards of any other show). The same happens if I go to Deck -> Archive -> Combos. I am only able to select Jeff and Snot on this screen too.
|
|
|
metadata
Only Snot, Jeff and Zapp work. All other characters do not
|
|
|
metadata
Glad to see I’m not the only one it’s not working for. This is annoying for the filter to not be working. Please fix!
|
|
|
metadata
Same issue. Only object cards allow for viewing combos
|
|
|
metadata
Also-- in deck>archive>combos ... if I search for a card I can't click through to the details/combos and such. Just does nothing.
:(
|
|
|
metadata
yep. searching for combos through characters in archive still not working.
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
If I do an object that way, I can drill down, but then it isn't showing the CM crowns on the combos... doing it through the other archive tab works, but I like that horizontal view better than the vertical one.
|
|
|
metadata
yep. both not working. pc version, chrome browser.
|
|
|
metadata
No response from support, wrote them two days ago and I’m getting nothing but crickets
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[Isol](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668660):**_
> From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
I think we should all boycott this Discord thing they’re trying to do. They know we prefer the forums here, but they don’t seem to care, obviously, if they’re refusing to acknowledge this filter issue here and have only responded ok discord. If none of us go to discord, they’ll be forced to continue here.
Sorry, I’m just so fed up and frustrated with how these dorks run this game
|
|
|
metadata
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[TattooedLadi](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668731):**_
> > _Originally posted by **[Isol](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668660):**_
> > From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
>
> I think we should all boycott this Discord thing they’re trying to do. They know we prefer the forums here, but they don’t seem to care, obviously, if they’re refusing to acknowledge this filter issue here and have only responded ok discord. If none of us go to discord, they’ll be forced to continue here.
>
> Sorry, I’m just so fed up and frustrated with how these dorks run this game
100%
|
|
|
metadata
So let me get this straight. Mods are reviewing post and deleting what they deem inappropriate but unable to acknowledge this thread or offer any support?
|
|
|
metadata
> *Originally posted by **[TattooedLadi](/forums/727068/topics/1953840?page=1#13668731)**:*
> > _Originally posted by **[Isol](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668660):**_
> > From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
>
> I think we should all boycott this Discord thing they’re trying to do. They know we prefer the forums here, but they don’t seem to care, obviously, if they’re refusing to acknowledge this filter issue here and have only responded ok discord. If none of us go to discord, they’ll be forced to continue here.
>
> Sorry, I’m just so fed up and frustrated with how these dorks run this game
I get the frustration, their lack of official responses here or there absolutely sucks. The acknowledgement of the issue was secondhand from the volunteer moderator who has special access to the official Kong moderators. I'm glad she passed it on to us, at least we got that much. Still, it's not enough IMO.
I like discord and have used it for years as part of my raiding guild in Warcraft; it works great for our 30 players. I still think these forums could provide a better experience and information for AT -- if only Kong would monitor it and respond timely to important issues and questions. Which they haven't been doing consistently for months, if not years at this point.
There are also people who routinely and only use the browser game chat for information and community, they will be left out in the cold, too. It sucks for a lot of people except the ones who like to hang out and chat in discord. Which seems to be about 20 people.
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[TattooedLadi](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668731):**_
> > _Originally posted by **[Isol](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668660):**_
> > From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
>
> I think we should all boycott this Discord thing they’re trying to do. They know we prefer the forums here, but they don’t seem to care, obviously, if they’re refusing to acknowledge this filter issue here and have only responded ok discord. If none of us go to discord, they’ll be forced to continue here.
>
> Sorry, I’m just so fed up and frustrated with how these dorks run this game
+1
|
|
|
metadata
> _Originally posted by **[TattooedLadi](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668731):**_
> > _Originally posted by **[Isol](/forums/726779/topics/1953840?page=1#13668660):**_
> > From discord, they know about it but no ETA for a fix.
>
> I think we should all boycott this Discord thing they’re trying to do. They know we prefer the forums here, but they don’t seem to care, obviously, if they’re refusing to acknowledge this filter issue here and have only responded ok discord. If none of us go to discord, they’ll be forced to continue here.
>
> Sorry, I’m just so fed up and frustrated with how these dorks run this game
This
|
|
|
metadata
Not working for me either. When will this be addressed and fixed????
|
|
|
metadata
I have now sent 3 emails total without a single reply. What really irritates me is no one has bothered to say anything to us on *here*
|