Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Showing the possible combinations for each box makes the whole idea of the mathematical operators pointless. You can just view the combinations and play it like regular sudoku without having to do any math.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
fun game, i just wish there was an easier way to know if one box is like "5+2" instead of "2+5" instead of guess and check, but i probably just didn't have a good strategy myself i guess
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
haha. i hate this game, it is too much maths. i tried it though because i love your other games. though saying that, i have managed to avoid doing any maths (or very little) because it shows you the numbers when you hover. solved by logic :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
+ if you randomly play this by typing in numbers and checking to see of thier right insted of reading the instructions and learning how to play XD
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1/5 until you improve the interface, many good suggestions have been voted upwards all the time on the other games, take care of your gamers!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Another conceptis game, another bunch of people getting really upset about having to click twice to get to the next puzzle instead of once.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Giving this game a 3, which is the average of 2 scores: 5 because I like this game and all others that Conceptis produces, and 1 because there is no improvement to the interface (after many, many suggestions by myself and others).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
not only is this a ripoff of kenkens, and making a different name for them 'calcudokus' as if you actually came up with this idea; but it's not fun to play... All of the calculations possible come up in the bottom rectangle, meaning that there's really no calculation needed to play the actual game.
@omgitsalex369, use the report missing badge function, or try reloading the game.
2/5 for ripping off a great puzzle, and also for having many of the same problems as your previous games did.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is generally called Kenken. There are a couple of sites online that have new Kenken puzzles daily - and harder ones than these (NY Times and kenken.com). If you want a more challenging puzzle (and one that doesn't do the match for you), check out one of these sites.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There is no calcu in calcudoku. On mouse over all posible combinations are listed, you actually can ignore all calculation. It's big help to visualize but also make the game too easy. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Absolutely love it, do you think you could add like a "No Checking Mode" to the next one? Would love the added challenge!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fun, as usual, but with some interface issues. Others have already mentioned the lack of a simple "next" button, but I'm also running into an issue with the popup number selector. If you move too quickly between consecutive boxes, the selector often pops up for the previous box, then disappears, since you're nowhere near it. For those who want a mouse-only game, this does get pretty annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Xotano You never have to guess at these types of puzzles. In the game you mention, you can use the '4 total' rectangle in the bottom right to deduce that the '3 total' rectangle above it must read '2 1'
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
pretty good game but too many of the level 2 puzzles rely on lucky guesses. like the second one you get a 1 and there is nothing containing a one in either of the possible directions making that 1 a non clue number.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok, so there is no point to a next button? what about music? something soothing would be the finishing touch to a game like this, with a mute button. No sound is just a bit ridiculous for a game on a computer. However, nice concept- and make a calculus version for lols. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I would like an option to turn off the possible solutions when you hover over a field.
I think that makes things a little too easy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay, I really like these games. But from now on I'm going to give one less star until we finally get a next puzzle button. It's not about the two seconds it costs me. It's about how often this has been requested and how easy this should be to implement.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
People, please stop acting like spoiled opera divas. Alright, a next button would be convenient, but a lack of it does not signify "not caring about people who love and play his games". For god's sake, you have to click either one or two times more, an operation that I can perform in 0.2 seconds, and coupled with moving to mouse should still not take more than a second. Less than a second. That's what you lose, and I do not consider it enough to take a well-deserved point off this excellent puzzle collection. Five marks.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The most difficult part of these games is wading through the terrible guides and working out how to play them. And still no 'next' button.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There should be Hardcore button, that would hide the possible combinations that can go in this equation. Then it will make sense to have pencil marks, they're useless. It's too easy for my tastes.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't like the error checking. It simply compares to the solution instead of actually checking to see if you just have numbers that are used repeatedly so you can figure out the solution on your own.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For such a crappy game in terms of rules and how to play, I'm addicted, but only 'cos I wanna get the badge. Crap game; 15 points achievement. That doesn't fit. -.-
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
can we shut up about the little things? i play the levels starting from the last level to the first, it's a great game and who cares if it doesn't have a "next level" button, god forbid you have to click two extra times. and so what they used the same template as the other games? it's a good template about the little things?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A pretty decent game, but since the creator has completely disregarded the many suggestions for a "next puzzle" feature, I will vote a 2 for it. This has been a big problem in all the earlier games, and since it has still not been dealt with, I can't rate this game any higher