Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Comments for Next, Please!

« Back to Next, Please!

Raptor000

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I don't see most of the problems alot of people mention. Laggy controls? mine were perfectly fine, so it's not really the game's fault. 72 stars too long? I got it in about 20 minutes. Nothing new shown in this game? possible, but depends if you've already played games of this type. I found this one pretty fun overall.

+ - !

(2)

schuler001

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) to get 3 stars on level 8, you must place 1 of the creatures close to the top so you can jump the next hole. Hope it helps

+ - !

(2)

Aeren1982

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) anyone got level 8 with 3 stars?

+ - !

(2)

jaskapiip

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) This makes me lag more than any other game o.O

+ - !

(0)

Hungi

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Level 8 sucks

+ - !

(-2)

otakat

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) I've rated this game at my review blog. Please check it out: http://theflashcritic.blogspot.com/2012/03/review-next-please.html

+ - !

(6)

Developer response from courageAE

Hey, nice review! thanks :)

AndrewN35

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-14)

Kisuke_Fanatic

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Fun game, but too easy. 3/5

+ - !

(1)

Abhorrence

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) What did you use to make this game ?

+ - !

(1)

Developer response from courageAE

I used FlashDevelop + Flixel framework; GIMP - for art

kenny211

Mar. 17, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Is level 24 supposed to be possible to be done without turning into stone once?

+ - !

(1)

nevermath

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Three of the most recent comments are rated down below the rating threshold and I can see no conceivable reason why, one is just lighthearted tease about the falling animation, why is that so offensive?

+ - !

(5)

smalljesse

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) nice simple puzzle. 5/5

+ - !

(1)

gamerscul9870

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) :3 yay, a next pixel game w/ badges, challenge accepted!

+ - !

(3)

Joffar

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) For a game that relies on precision timing, this game suffers from serious lag issues. Your whole game mechanic is in timing the stones, and it is extremely frustrating when a lag spike means I end up too high to jump onto and have to redo the level. This happened more than once. It is a real problem.

+ - !

(0)

JSilvis

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) This is a great game. It's nothing groundbreaking and there are similar games like it. But that's ok, not every game needs to be some earth shatteringly new genre. This is a fantastic genre, and this one is very well done. Extremely fun puzzle/platformer. 4.5/5

+ - !

(0)

Sanmei

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Has some physics issues. My character keeps spastically lifting his arms up in the "falling downward" animation stance, despite being firmly planted on solid ground.

+ - !

(-1)

1Shot

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-7)

klint26

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-16)

InitiateEntity

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Ok game. Waaaaaay too much reliance on timing your jumps to make sure you can stone up in the right spot, which ended up in restarting the map multiple times to get that "just right" spot. 3/5

+ - !

(2)

wolfman427

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-9)

DarthJerak

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Wish there was more than 1 "gimmick" and more control to the jump (although I realize that it creates the challenge.) I hate that if the second block is 1 pixel higher than the first the character can't walk over it and the whole level is ruined. Other than that its a solid puzzle/platform. 4/5

+ - !

(2)

JamesRandall

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) The idea might have been good if the Medium badge only required 65 stars or something, all 72 took far too long and was not worth the effort.

+ - !

(1)

Ghostmaker8177

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) To be completely honest, if it wasn't for the badges I wouldn't go near the game again. Very, very annoting and really not fun at all.

+ - !

(1)

no1313

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) its a dog isnt it

+ - !

(-2)

notaplayer

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) it looks like a fish without its body..

+ - !

(1)

ryguypiee

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

Falos

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Know what's popular with "reset until you get (them all) perfect" games? Rewinds. Or at least quick resets, and I suppose this one's not too slow.

+ - !

(6)

Xerberos

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Never alone!

+ - !

(0)

stark52

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Sequel, Sequel, Sequel!!!! Please!!

+ - !

(-1)

robrargh

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) For me, on lv13 the turrets shoot again as soon as the flames hit the floor. On the walkthru there is a delay between shots. I think this may be down to my slowish processer, but can u fix please? It makes the game MUCH harder + impossible to get 3 stars. Otherwise fun game

+ - !

(0)

Fexghadi

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Too short because it's really easy. Maybe some more challenge in the Next, Please! episode?

+ - !

(-2)

Mouse42

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) fun, but too short

+ - !

(0)

Ulong

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) fun

+ - !

(0)

Michalius

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @SirVoltsworth - I thought so too at the beggining. Then I turned to stone lower so that I could jump ;)

+ - !

(0)

psychocamel

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Very very good and very short. I hope this was a tester game for bigger things to come. If not, meh I still enjoyed my time spent playing it. Thank you =]

+ - !

(0)

Matador450

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-16)

tigerbrace

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-24)

Arbiter27

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-5)

Baalor

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Badges didn't register for me in Chrome browser, but loading the game in IE and re-playing level 1 awarded them.

+ - !

(-2)

StarWarsGeek

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show)

+ - !

(-14)

PerfectChabo

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) tricky puzzle game, but NOT driving you up the wall, because of any impossible maze/riddle-jump-click-keycombo stuff. like!!

+ - !

(2)

bobby71983

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) slightly original concept, i enjoyed it.

+ - !

(0)

asquith9

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) 10/5!!!

+ - !

(1)

kingethnor

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) quite a nice little game, the only things i would say is "x" is a bit awkward to press when moving there are lots of nicer buttons spare and a restart button at the end of each level would be nice but apart from that a really nice little game.

+ - !

(3)

stunt

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) very nice game, also the music is great...could be longer ;) 5/5

+ - !

(1)

martin0499

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) Great game! 5/5

+ - !

(1)

Dean647

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) double comment: er, it says that sharigon saved 100 creatures... also, badges!

+ - !

(0)

Dean647

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @Was wondering how the hell you have 4000 more points than me. Then I realized that it's because you saved 6 more creatures than me........ ­ Welp, time to look for some new strats :p

+ - !

(0)

Potegaman

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) @Dean647: I felt the same at first. But then I realized that each extra second gives you exactly 19 points, so you can always calculate what your personal best time was. By the way, my 87400 score is 100% legit, try to beat it if you can... one guy already did. (Current No.1 92k score is obviously fake - the guy had 129 creatures alive before his score was deleted.)

+ - !

(1)

Dean647

Mar. 16, 2012

Under rating threshold (show) for those of us speedrunning every level, it would help to show the best time (not just best score) for each level :) Great game!

+ - !

(1)

  • add a comment
Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms Privacy Code of Conduct
© 2024 Kongregate