Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love love love logic games like this. However this one misses the mark. The colors seem random, and it is very difficult to see which selections are already made. The rules change seemingly randomly, in that one puzzle has a single selection the next has double and the following back to single. The redeeming play-ability is hovering the clue (repeatedly on/off) to find which possibilities must be, and in rare circumstances which simply can be eliminated. The only thing hard about it is the interface, which the "hard mode" only intensifies sadly. The logic is really quite simple. How about removing no longer relevant clues? Nah, its "harder" to wade through them...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Entertaining game, but i hate that the X to remove a clue is a circle but the hitbox of that circle is bigger (rectangle?). So you get sometimes missclicks for no reason until you realize that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I finished 15 levels, had 'continue' / 'select level' when I went to main screen. Refreshed the game, progress lost. Annoying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm a puzzle kind of guy and I found this game unique and very fun! I caught on a little slow but when I did, it was great! I gave it a 5/5 and hope to see more just like it! Great job, 'Crescentyr'! \o/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had a lot of fun with the game on normal mode. But when I got to hard mode, it wasn't as engaging. Not being able to remove guys wasn't a very interesting or engaging challenge. I ended up stopping because it became a chore rather than a fun exercise. I would prefer a mode that gave you fewer, more strict clues instead.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Personally, I think this game becomes easy when you have too many 'x and y are in the same space' and 'x and y are as far apart as they can be on this house size' clues. The later levels aren't too hard if you start off just doing those two types of clue only, then do the rest. Interesting take on the whole logic puzzle game genre though!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Clicking near the edge of an icon gives you an "incorrect" guess which is pretty annoying if, like me, you always aim for 0 mistakes in puzzle games.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the hitboxes are pretty weird, i can barely count how many times i clicked on an x instead of the figure, but otherwise it's honestly not bad
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Is anyone else having lag problems? It gets worse the more squares there are. At 4x5 I can just barely crawl through a 2nd before I have to reload the web page (and I always have to reload), and at 5x5 I lag by the time I go to the next page of clues and barely make it through one puzzle. It doesn't seem to be able to handle the 150+ things to click on plus the half dozen clue pages... or something like that.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Found a bug. I was on level 14, and I completed it. However, one of the clues didn't switch to the tick, even though both images were in the confirmed right place.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game would be nicer if it wasn't so darn particular with what it accepts as a correct click... So far I've managed to fail eight times because I happened to click the correct animals just a teeny bit too far outside of its exact middle.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's a little bit annoying when I already solved the puzzle but have to click on those two little figure in the square to "highlight" them, it should be auto. Good game but kinda simple 4/5, love this kind of games
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
One thing that might be ambiguous is that clues mean that one item is strictly above/below/at left/at right of another, and not just "one floor higher". For someone who didn't get it (and its easy to not get it) some levels might rely on random to solve
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
maybe you should not use + signs, because the possibility of having two items in one box is much lower than having just one! (which means that sign removes a lot of options, which makes game quite easy)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love that puzzle since MS-DOS game "Sherlock". Your version is too easy. Most objects are rare enough, so we can place one or even two objects nearly on every clue, never need to go back to previous clues, and somewhere near middle of the board can just click all unique objects and finish puzzle using less than half of clues. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ah geez, please fix the hit-testing! How many times have I restarted a level because I clicked a character but it thought I clicked the "X"...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Rather than a puzzle game, it became more like a "clean up your messy room" game, where there's just too much clues so it's not necessarily hard. It is just that there's too much mess to clean up that you find it annoying
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really dont like visual style of this game. It's cute, but is quite messy. A lot of stuff looks similar to each over, and even selecting a clue doesn't help much as it just adds more colors to overall scheme. My proposal solution would be to make stuff not mentioned in the clue black/white, so it's easier to notice withour eye pain.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice enough concept with cute graphics, but there's not enough to actually think about. The main work in this game is searching for the icons, and the actual riddle is almost never anything to write home about.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Imo "hard" mode is better than "normal" mode, since the X button gets really annoying in the big levels. I never used it, but when I clicked too fast i would hit the X button and it counted as a mistake and had to restart levels often.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If I click on the correct icon, I should never get the "wrong guess" penalty. Just because I don't have a relevant clue highlighted does not mean I'm guessing randomly. Especially when it's a "+" level and there are only two icons left in a square.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice, but when the rooms get too small, you can easily miss the cross and click on the icon, which gets you a wrong guess
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Mediocre at best. Never had to remove any item. After a number of clues it gets so easy you can almost stop looking at them (especially in paired rooms). And it gets way too cramped when there are 16+ rooms, it's a torture for the eyes. By no mean a bad game, but I wouldn't replay.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Cute game but there is an issue where it tells me I've made a mistake for something that ends up being correct later in the level.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
On level 13 I solved the puzzle by clicking on the pets once the rooms only had 2 items left in them. This left 3 "Clues" uncleared and would not let me progress or fail after that point.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not a hard game at all but enough challenge to work your brain. I really enjoyed these puzzles. Occasionally I would see the plus and think it was a 1 in my head That and miss clicking the x or the picture when going for the x was my only errors. Could probably go through this pretty fast if you just guessed a lot as there is at most like 2 options for a combo. My only suggestion is maybe auto click once there are only 2 left in the box as i was always looking for ones alone i had not clicked. Keep up the great work.