Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great physics (perhaps too great), but boring gameplay. The lining up has to be too exact for any continuation, and a gamer's attention span has no time for that! Thanks for the mute button though. :D Keep at it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Played for a little bit. Got annoyed with how picky the shapes were and how much the shapes spin. Looked for a pause button because I wanted to chat for a bit. Tried clicking menu, as no other pause was apparent. Lost progress. Downvoted. Left annoyed twitterish comment.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
too short, too repetative, physics are shakey, music awful, and did Nothing to "re-define" anything. The only thing I can say was the graphics were alright. 2/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
physics suck, need more mass.
Too bouncy and if you press objects together the top one should not shoot off when you release.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great game but too picky. Relax the constraints; some people don't have the patience to get it perfect. (Maybe make it picky on extreme but lax on relaxed?)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the whole spin on mouse click thing when you pick em up is not working for me.
How about a no high score Simple-mode?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's good, fine physics. I had to dock off a point though because of the arrogant description -- "re-defines the puzzle game era"??? I don't think so....
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The controls are somewhat realistic and difficult at the same time, which really makes this a great construction puzzle. Unlike others I've played, this one uses an interesting angle system, making it harder to move and position the pieces. I gave it a 4 out of 5.