Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game should have some kind of daily reward, possibly? More incentive for people to check/play daily, and give the veteran players more "fair" rewards!
This is commonly listed as the #1 thing that people hate about these types of games... so I don't think that'd be a good idea. The reward is that you get to advance quicker as you'll be using more energy/stress.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
when i passed out while i was banging my escort it must of been pretty akward for the escort considering i literally PASSED OUT in the middle of the action
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In response to your query in the "updates" section, I am using Windows 7 and have not experienced problems seeing the safe deposit boxes (I haven't tried using them). I'm running the game in Chrome.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In the Cloutiest Leaderboard, It shows these symbols or something next to a players name, "_\-^-/_" or "._\+^+/_.". What do they mean?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am a windows 7 32 bits user and i can see the safe deposit boxes just fine, with LOCKED written on them and everything. i use (probably)the latest version of google chrome.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Oh....yea..whatever you said, that's just my theory cuz i have seen many anti-capitalist bills getting challenged :P.
The constitution of the united states is set up such that the federal government doing much of anything is potentially unconstitutional. Obviously lifting bans of things and removing taxes can't be subject to a challenge. As such, the challenge system favors the libertarian party somewhat... but that's kind of how the constitution is written.
I personally find it kind of amusing how much foreign/military aid we throw at both Israel, Palestine and a good bit of the middle east. At some point it just kind of feels like we're fighting ourselves.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm having trouble introducing bills from Foreign Relations. The Introduce button doesn't work. Also in the next update can we have trade as a ajustabale option.
Congress can't directly dictate trade between nations. That makes no sense. Also, the feature is not implemented yet. You're just seeing a preview of the interface.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The citizens of countries are mostly buisennes men. when theres a bill like max wage then it would obviously get challenged. Though something like "Repeal child labor laws" would be ignored and passed. The citizens call challenges on bills and your only chance of getting a anti-capitalist bill to pass court is having lots of anti-capatilist supreme court....am i right
?.......therefore citizens only call challenges on bills that will give them cons and not benefits.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I scored a gaff with "Equate Taxes To Thievery" on "Regressify Tax Law". How does that make sense when regressifying reduces taxes?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@balony67 Gerrymandering is the process of altering voting districts to make the vote lean more your way whereas think tank payoff allows a bill to get a boost by paying people, illegally, to help with the process
The scepter is a lavish display of wealth and makes people dislike you. The trendy smartphone decreases it as it's something trendy (ie purchased for reasons other than its merits). That's the theme of that line of T3 gear.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
how do you introduce bills in the foreign relations because the introduce button is not woking for me is there something i missed out or do u have to be tier 4 to introduce those kind of bills or something?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There is a bug about the supreme court: If more than one challenge ends at the same day, the second message just says: No justices voted to upheld and no justices voted to strike it down.
Hm... I have noticed this bug, but I think it's happened even when there was only one challenge in the day. I'll be looking into it after I finish most of FR (possibly today!)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i believe that the greens party win bill should be changed. the real greens party would NEVER go out of their way to kill people, they'd just completely neglect them, so it could be, for example "cut all public health funding"
Legalizing homicide is exactly what you describe. It doesn't encourage homicide. (also, I've actually gotten a lot of gleeful comments from green party members about that bill. I know more than a few of those types IRL and they do actually hate humanity/think we should all die. It's an oddly common opinion amongst them.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@billybobojo: Yes. Also, if you have the skeletons in your closet trait and you get investigated on a really serious thing (e.g. assassination) you can get sent to prison and therefore have to restart.
Only the background trait "skeletons in your closet" can result in prison. Most scandals are indirect/suggestive enough that their discovery isn't really sufficient for a criminal case (or it's about something that congresspersons have immunity for).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had an idea! For the campaign contributions, the contributors wouldn't want to give money to the congressman, and then have it fail, right? So, for every time a campaign contribution fails or just sets out and rots, the remaining contributions are devalued, and if they successfully passed a contribution, or several of them, they get a small boost in value for the next contribution they accept?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I CANT BELIEVE YOU WOULD PASS A BILL LIKE THAT! I VOTED FOR YOU, BUT ID WONT BE NDOING IT NEXT TIME I ASSUME YOU THAT!
What???
It's never strong/weak, costs more energy than a normal ability and does a highly random (and potentially large) amount of damage that can be negative. The ability texts are mostly gibberish/random political gaffes.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
is blackmail scandalous? if so doesn't that mean you could blackmail someone for blackmailing someone?... for blackmailing someone.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For the Speaker of the House, are you going to implement a system where instead of all CT4 party members are up election, each party will elect 2-3 of their own CT4 players? This could say run in the Party Chat and last 1 week those with the most votes could then advance into the actual Speaker of the House elections. This would help cut down on those thinning votes from there being too many people to nominate.
I will be making it so you have to nominate yourself in order to be electable. For technical reasons this is much easier to do right after I run the elections.
um... it's been 2000/box since I introduced the feature prior to the game even being on Kongregate.... I think you may be misremembering or perhaps experienced some kind of bug.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Some paparazzi got pictures of you smoking a cigar, and now it's in headlines due to the general anti-tobacco sentiment of the nation." Good think I wasn't drinking liquor or there could've been a riot outside my house.
If you die/get unelected, the piece of equipment you're wearing in that slot will be moved to your deposit box when you die. Primarily this was introduced for people with custom items, so they could wear them but still save them if they were to unexpectedly die.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Amazing Game. If you are a fan of satire, politics, Those Facebook Mafia games or even just old school Text Based RPGs this is the game for you. Delosford did a great job and he's great at Bug Reports too. 5/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
oh. I didn't know there was a limit on the clout tier of the founder of a bill to play a CC on it. it does work on a CT 4 introduced bill, and I think I was trying to play it on a CT 2 bill.
I can't remember exactly how I limited it, but the inductor may need to be CT3 for a CC... though I thought that only applied to PP. I can't really remember how I set it.