Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I used to play a slightly different version of this game when I was a little kid. We called it Scoots. Awesome game! I think I like these rules better.
PS, just had to brag. I just won in 5 turns :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've noticed a pattern. Who ever wins the roll to go first wins! I really like this game, but it certainly isn't fair. When I'm at 9000+ and the game has a score around 5000, it will very often get free roll after free roll after free roll (in the same turn) and suddenly it wins.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is sucks. Would be good, but the CPU is cheating. 1500 points five time a raw, 6000 points in one turn, etc. My best score is 1800 points is one turn, after 1.5 hour game. One of the most annoying game ever. 1/5 (because there is no 0/5).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Is it me or does the computer just get really lucky. I was at 10900 and the computer only had 7800 when the final round started. He won.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Poor, poor gaby. :( I at least hope his family is handling his death well, and that they are secure, not just financially.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So i had 4000pts when he had 7000, I banked over 6000 at once, and yet he bet me. "Great skill and a little luck" wtf does "a little" mean? xP
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You really get to hate it, when you pwn your opponent with 9950 to -500 and
he comes back with a 15 Thisnumberdoesntevenexistillion points and beats you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
there is no skill in this game, games of chance with badges are infuriating. the last one should have been an impossible badge.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
4/5 because it's really cool game but not 5/5 because if you have 3 zlitches in a row you have -500 and don't -500 on the 4th but on the 6th!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Words cannot describe my reaction when I'm at 9950 without hitting zilch and THEN I hit it. I'm sorry, but the RNG is broked.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
totally cheated game. Just had 9000:-340. He makes a turn giving him 14560 points. On easy.
Happening the 6th time now. Im done. This is probaly the worst luck-game i ever seen.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If I had kreds, I will donate the kreds to this game, after I know the creator was died. I hope the creator will go to heaven.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When you make the awards so excruciatingly painful..the least that you could to to ease the pain would be to provide a RESET button!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@RedGoo - According to the provided in game stats, I have won 29 games and lost 27 games. Out of those, I have won 18 games against 'reckless' (lost 14) and 11 games against 'cautious' (lost 6). Something I have noted is that reckless tends to take chances, i.e. rolling when only one dice is left. I normally don't take chances like that. So, yes, the CPU will often get rolls amounting to more than 1,000 points but the CPU will also often get zilches. However, even without taking the same risks, I will usually get at least two 1,000+ rolls a game. The roll of the dice is controlled by chance, but what risks you take is controlled by strategy. I meant to merely point out that claiming a game "rigged" after loosing a few rounds is not statistically sound.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"(Unless you are just hitting the roll button without discretion.)" - whatamithinking
I am hitting like crazy cause the cpu get free roll after free roll raking in 2,000+ points while I keep getting single 1 and 5 and with the occasion free roll if I am lucky.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i would probably enjoy this game a lot more if i didn't have to see how terribly the cpu plays while still beating me
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
First round against Reckless: Reckless goes first *rolls* 3 PAIRS! *rolls again* 1-2-3-4-5-6! *player has quit the game*
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am not sure if people realize that just because they "lost 10/10 times," it does not mean that the game is "rigged." Now if you play 1,000+ games and the CPU rolled 1,000+ points every turn, then your claim might have validity. As it is, this is a game of chance. Chance means that even if you know the strategy, you will loose at some point. It could be compared to poker: a person could be a professional poker player, but if he or she is dealt a bad hand, he or she will probably lose despite his or her skill level. Please calm down and try to enjoy the game. Because it is based on chance, the CPU will loose eventually. (Unless you are just hitting the roll button without discretion.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the tutorial was not that great, the words would go off screen so i could no read the whole slip of paper and i could not click on the text to see the scoring guide, i had no idea how to play the game... and now i have a negative score...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Got the easy badge in less than 5 min, but I 've had a lot of practice playing the real dice game - FARKLE. Pretty darn similiar. Less than $10 at Wal-fart!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A great game, but the cpu seems to be rigged. It scored nearly 2000 points in a row within two turns. It just seems ridiculous. Even on easy mode the cpu will dominate you. Nevertheless it is a good game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just like the old drinking game only better, no cheaters in this one. Drink up and roll them bones, it just keeps getting better!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I was so happy when I saw "A game of skill and chance" as the subtitle. I thought to myself, maybe I can become skilled enough to outweigh the chance? Roll. Only option is one 5 for 50 pts. Roll again because I can't bank. Nothing. Zilch. Yep, being trapped into zilching with nothing you can do seems pretty skill based to me. I look at that phrase now and almost laugh.