Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Some way of visualizing how many hits gems in play have would help with strategising and optimum gem placement, maybe a heat map you can toggle or something would be awesome and help strategising.
Love the game great atmosphere and near endless fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ever get the horrible feeling when the lag becomes so bad that there is no action you can take. First, it takes a couple of seconds for the game to respond. Finally, no response as the game continues without you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
you know, I think the towers would be notably more effective if they fired AT the enemies, instead of in the opposite direction so they can show off that their shots have homing.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
so you can't do endurance mode without kreds. really? maybe its a level thing but if that is behind a paywall I would be really disappointed as I have enjoyed the previous installments of this game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Has anyone actually defeated any field on the "Haunting" difficulty? As soon as I unlocked it, I went and tried F1. This is the easiest field with 3 waves, starting with a 4hp wave. LULZ, right? Well even with wizard level 170, the first wave just marched right on by and smashed my orb. O_O
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What exactly does "Damage taken limited to 199" mean? Is that to say that no matter how hard you hit it, you're only going to hurt it 199 per shot?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a good example of how micro transactions are done well and how to create an annoying paywall that you avoid out of principle. micro transactions allow you to DONATE to the developers while enriching the game, most do this with novelty skins and textures. A paywall is when 1/3 or more of the game is inaccessible without PAYING real money, it may as well not be part of the game. Take this to hart when you make the next one please not all of you players have credit cards.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Perfectly right loki, such people dont have appetite in their bellies for others concern, the more rich they get the more lazy and corrupt. And if that weren't good enuf, they resort to cheap ad tricks to charge more money, no wonder all that money goes into their bellies. 1 suggestion : If you want to see some improvement, die now and be reborn after 100 years or so..
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Everyone knows that horrible feeling when Kongregate and the Devs have not bothered to adjust server capacity for a holiday weekend, despite traffic jams every single year on the same days...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Great Iteration in the series, although I feel as though the difficulty is becoming less and less with each game made?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Allow me to revise my previous comment: There are far too many levels. Each level takes a very long time to beat, as the game gets going. The game can seem daunting to get started on, but you end out using the same tactics over and over. It feels unfair when you lose a level after a half hour because the guy who shows up on L50 is significantly stronger than the prior baddies. 418 achievements is too many, the game is too long, and fans of prior Gemcraft games will find that this one has very little changed as far as gameplay goes.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nakka, there are 162 fields (counting the vision fields). The other 143 fields have 3 difficulty settings, diverse trait settings plus endurance runs. There are also 418 achievements to earn. I have played all the previous GemCraft games and find this one the most challenging.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There aren't enough levels. Also, the levels play too quickly (although the intra-level challenges feel dramatically different). The game is too easy to get started on, but you never get to use the same tactic twice after you get going. It feels fair to have a big boss come at the end of 50 waves that is significantly stronger than prior baddies. It would be nice if there were more achievements, the game is too short, and fans of the prior gemcraft games may be disappointed by how different this one plays.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Save is working in Chrome for me (I'm on a macbook) so I pasted my save file ito the Chrome folder in macromedia shared objects and got my game back.
Not sure if this will work for anyone else though x
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
just as I said, the game is really buggy cause I got it the second time I tried ****http://i.imgur.com/Z3W1KAx.png**** why why why not the first timeeeee!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The game is really annoyingly buggy, I tried for 2 achievements at N4, but got only 1, ****http://i.imgur.com/32f5hOP.png**** If you conclude that I used gems other than poison then obviously you belong to the 99.999999% of population whose average IQ is zero,
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So it's not just me then? I'll stop poking my laptop and calling it names then. I've reported it as a bug and we'll see what happens...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So I've finished this game on Steam... any way to copy it across so I can get the achievements here without doing everything again?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That feeling when you go to play the game you've invested hours of play in, when you've reached level 1617 and your save has been wiped.
Apparently 'nobody did anything to the laptop'.
Everyone can go and kick rocks, I'm going to be over here crying.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Thanks a lot Aonar, alboy, its just as I thought, at level 114 wizard with 2261 shadow cores, right now all talisman slots have "+x initial mana", total 893, and also been collecting fragments (rarity 6 to 24) of "+ x% of wizard level to starting mana/xp", full upgrades to them totals to "191% to starting mana/xp", calculations say the breakeven is at level 456, so have to wait for a while, have all the skill points(1268) invested in skills (also did the reset), nice to remind me of having some unspent points, thanks again, and yea what calin said is irrelevant to me also, probably answered on his own without understanding the question properly