Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"I have a question - it doesn't seem to recognise five of a kind, either as a kind or a full house. I don't know the poker rules, so is this as intended, or a bug?"
I added 5 of a kind. Full houses need to be in order, is that what you are seeing?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really like the deck, it gives equal weight to number and symbol, and the colours make it easier to spot flushes. I have a question - it doesn't seem to recognise five of a kind, either as a kind or a full house. I don't know the poker rules, so is this as intended, or a bug?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I worked hard to get a straight flush, but it was out of order (j-q-10-a-k), and all I got was a lousy 200 pts for a flush. Weak.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Game is ok, but it would be better if the game recognized poker hands even if they were out of order. (6-9-7-8-10 as a straight for example)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
seems like a decent game :) personally just not good at poker nor do i have the mental capacity to sit there and think for long periods of time =D lol ... 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My last statement made it sound like it was 1.0, here's a list of a few of the changes:
-Direct manipulation (use the mouse to move cards instead of click clack)
-Timer
-Multiplier scoring
-Sound
And more
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's not incredibly different than 1.0; it's basically what 1.0 should have been, but I was so sick of it at the end I just put it out.