Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Did you guys just take the faces of celebrities and give them customizable hair? 50 Cent and Johnny Depp are unmistakeable.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the game for some lighthearted poker playing although they do scare me when they are all staring at me constantly lol!!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Positives(+): I love the graphics, the best I saw for a poker game. Not to mention the perks collecting bonus chips, create an avatar, and spin to win. Negatives(-): Constant all-ins. Limitless Chips. And finally, the No Goal factor. I don't find the point in playing other than casually.
Which Concludes my vote offers a 3 Star.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
omfg stupid game u made me lose 200k chips and i coudlnt even gamble it away it just dissapeared when i got stuck in some game!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Avatar selection: randomize is a horrible feature. Just let the player browse and select their own avatar, for pete's sake.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Why is it that I can't fold and instead have to let the timer run out? If my hand is bad, I shouldn't be forced to bet on it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
need to tweak the randomness of the decks, as chip leaders seem to win more than they should in race/showdown phase. (Lost numerous times w/ pocket K or A to river straights/flushes.. That does happen.. but not 60% of the time.)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what the hell man... I just played for 40 mins a sit and go and when it was just me and another guy heads up it booted me off the screen and out of the sit and go... do you think im going to play another sit and go so it can boot me off again? NO! just wasted 40 mins of my life
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am very disappointing in this game, while the graphics are good the avatars can be very crude, as well as there are a few bugs, such as the text boxes not going away above the avatar's head. The gameplay is also not up to par as you can get literally thousands of chips in 5 min by leveling. This is leading to players calling everything and going all in almost every hand, and with the add chips feature if you fail, you just add more, this can lead to a large amount of chips at a table where the buy in is 100 and the chip leader has 3000. Also, the player with the largest stack makes it so you must go all in, or fold, which for players that actually play makes it impossible to not get blinded out. Many times the pots on tables with buy ins at 200 have pots over 1000, with no player having more then a pair, for a player trying to play, this is infuriating. I DO NOT recommend this game for anyone.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I left the table I was playing on after getting to about 80k chips and now I don't have any of those??? What happened? Can you not leave a table? I don't understand, need help!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Could not agree less with the description. The graphics are just mediocre, the gameplay is anything but authentic, and I would be very sad to see if this ever gets above 4.4. The cash prices maybe true.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice graphics does not a good poker game make. Sadly , this one fails (and HARD) because you end up playing with utter idiots who go ALL IN on every occasion. Also, when joining a table with 1000 chips in your stack (out of the 65000 I have been given for free), someone is on there with a 13,000 chip stack and proceeds to bet you out of the game at every turn. All is all, the game is unfair and far more balencing needs to be done on this to make it fun. Governor of poker is still a better poker game than this
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So it's not just the staring that's awkward...it's the fact that they're sat in a semi-circle so they can all stare at you comfortable while leaning back in their seat. Why do they only sit in a semi-circle? Dafuq?