Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Once you have a fair amount of chips, "smart seat" will try to trick you into sitting at a high stakes table, by first putting you at an empty table, then seating you where it wants
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
limitless chips at anyone's disposal, people calling all ins with 9 5 and getting lucky, donkeys galore. in poker something is at stake if chips are easy to come by people play like morons and suck out constantly. programing is pre determined as well. if your cards are cold they will always stay cold. i watched a guy get strait flush twice in one game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is not poker, you can't play real poker when you have nearly a limitless amount of money, so you can go all-in everytime.
This is just flat out pointless.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
garbage as fck....piece of sht game played by dumbaszes and a shity azs random generator thats not "BS"....false advertising
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I dont care about exp and leveling, its a bit annoying to see every hand how much exp you've earned in such a visual way... Make it a option so we can turn that off...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Game has many errors on it. Like example auto calls and auto folds. I talked to other players and they say the same thing. What I dont understand is why they dont fix it. Anyways the game is okay and can be fun until the auto thing starts to happen. I rate it 5 0ut of 10 .
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Can we just up and get rid of or turn off the Bonus Chips option? 100 chips is absolutely worthless in this game, and the chimes and bells and whistles noise it makes it annoying at best. Or at least make the value something worthwhile.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Game has bugs. Just had a hand with a side pot where there should not have been one, and I came in 3rd out of the money when I should have been 2nd. I've also seen it deal out the cards as if no more betting was possible, even though that wasn't the case. Certainly won't be spending RL $ on this game because it's buggy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Could not agree less with the description. The graphics are just mediocre, the gameplay is anything but authentic, and I would be very sad to see if this ever gets above 4.4. The cash prices maybe true.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok, my plug is green but im always get stuck during the game freeze out for a min or two without beeing able to do anything. Hope this can be fixed coz is very annoying, apart from this kool game it will be a 5 stars without this problem, for now 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am very disappointing in this game, while the graphics are good the avatars can be very crude, as well as there are a few bugs, such as the text boxes not going away above the avatar's head. The gameplay is also not up to par as you can get literally thousands of chips in 5 min by leveling. This is leading to players calling everything and going all in almost every hand, and with the add chips feature if you fail, you just add more, this can lead to a large amount of chips at a table where the buy in is 100 and the chip leader has 3000. Also, the player with the largest stack makes it so you must go all in, or fold, which for players that actually play makes it impossible to not get blinded out. Many times the pots on tables with buy ins at 200 have pots over 1000, with no player having more then a pair, for a player trying to play, this is infuriating. I DO NOT recommend this game for anyone.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
horribly inaccurate, how can almost everyone's hands won to played ratio be the same, right about 1/4 or 25% ... fail
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When there are no more bets and 2 or more people are still in the game. It should show everyone's cards who didn't fold.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Since the vast difference in player quality is a huge concern, a ranking system would be your Godsend. That way idiots would play with idiots, decent player would play with decent players, good players would play with good players, and the pros would play with the pros. It would ensure a great game 100% more often than what you get now. That said, Sit and Go's are normally full of actual players.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The sensational feeling running through my veins when I play this game is indescribable!! Its better than punching a johovas witness in the face and running down the street naked shouting "The end is nigh".
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
when I played this version of poker with this new look like your really sitting at the table I go hooked love the graffic look most of all now do blackjack like this love fresh deck poker look 2 thumbs up for real.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I actually do like the game, it's pretty good. The onlky thing that get's on my nerves though is Guests coming on the tables and going all in, again and again, and winning our paid chips. Other than that it's pretty good. Best thing to do is avoid tables that have guests on there I guess.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Positives(+): I love the graphics, the best I saw for a poker game. Not to mention the perks collecting bonus chips, create an avatar, and spin to win. Negatives(-): Constant all-ins. Limitless Chips. And finally, the No Goal factor. I don't find the point in playing other than casually.
Which Concludes my vote offers a 3 Star.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The rating in this game is as follows: If it has like 50 ratings, and only 1 star, you know its a good player, because he pissed off alot of players :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I find it hilarious every time I go to rate a player 5/5 (just so I'll know next time I run into them), I find they have like 50+ 1/5 ratings. LMAO butthurt much? "Waaaah you're better than me and took my money, I hate you imma rate you 1/5 hahaha gottem!"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As a suggestion would be useful if after a all-in a player will have to wait for 3 rounds (or other number) it would prevent people for beaing all-in all the time and make the game more fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice job removing your fresh deck poker game from my laptop. Apparently, not enough brain power in your IT department. If I owned the game, they would no longer be employed. Since I don't, I have the power to never use/play anything from you. Morons.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Any chance of getting 9-ring games for the range of stakes, instead of just 6? The popularity (regular fullness) of the 9-ring games suggests that they would work at other stakes as well.
Also, other games (Omaha, stud, etc.) would be nice if you could fit them in :)