Under rating threshold (hideshow)
375 on my first play through. But I still think it needs definite improvement to actually be considered a game and not a waste
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it's dropped to 2.5 since you can't destroy wooden boards with some 50 bombs in a row. That's kinda...yeah, not real at all.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I like the physics of the game. And the difficulty makes it pretty cool too. But the fact that it's just a little too similar to ragdoll cannon (and the fact that you can't restart the level after you kill all the "bugs") just kinda makes my scoring lover for it. Something around, oh 3.5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
790 8-)
maybe its just me, but quite frankly, this is a game where I enjoyed shooting till my finger was sore! fun stuff, great game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nuklear if you wasted more then 10 seconds figuring out that you cant break those objects. then you my friend are retarded.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
0.25/5 aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
im bored -.-
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It seems odd you can't destroy wooden objects especially considering there's visible scarring on them. You might want to tell people that up front, so they don't waste shots trying to brute force their way through obstacles. Or try another art direction. Other than that, it's another solid entry into your growing list of cannon physics games.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I hate when people lie about there score, like, rexal6, you definately did not get 146 on your first try, even your hundredth try I bet you couldnt do that, even killjack98, I doubt you got 239. So......yeah stfu.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it was great but i gave up trying to not use that many shots...that wasnt fun for me...it was much funner just clicking nonstop