Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You shouldn't get a win when your opponent leaves, then people can join games and leave and the person will get a win, they can repeat that and get a really good score for not playing the game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
JSilvis, the Hard campaign is not impossible, as I have completed it. Yes, it took a while but if you keep at it things eventually go your way.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I actually really enjoy this, it's too bad the Hard is nearly impossible just because you only get horrible cards. I love how Kong says "There is some luck involved here, but nothing that can't be overcome with a bit of patience and a finely tuned deck". Some luck my ass..it's pure luck and even then it's hard. Plus the PvP tie thing, that's if anyone even plays anymore.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hard campaign completed – There is some luck involved here, but nothing that can't be overcome with a bit of patience and a finely tuned deck.5 multiplayer wins
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is a great game! The only problem I face is in multiplayer. Sometimes people can leave the game or refuse to play a card, and there's no punishment for stalling/leaving besides a tie or a dropped game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i dont think the hard badge depends too much on luck, i needed max 2 tries for each battle in the hard campaign and i dont think i was that unbelievable lucky!
really fun and cool game, but i agree with sohryukei that the sacrifice cards are way too powerfull
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I actually really enjoyed the first CastleWars single player. This version is far, far too dependent on luck. The Hard campaign cripples you, and essentially you have to get the right draws while the computer gets poor ones. The minimum of 75 cards (with the corresponding maximum of 5 of each) makes it impossible to get a ratio which would tip the odds in your favor, or at least even things out. I agree Card Info should be present on mouse over (maybe after a two or three second delay), and leaving a multiplayer game should count as a loss for the one who leaves, or at least a win for the person staying. Card games are very difficult to make and balance, and AI isn't as easy as it may seem. Castle Wars 2 could be much better, and I encourage the author to address these issues. With additional cards and less reliance on randomness, this could be a deep, fun game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the more places you take over the better starting resources you should have. Also, it would have been nice to know that you can't take a gather down to 0.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So good! So good! But there should be the two player mode, like in the original game (I do not mean the multiplayer mode! But that where you can play with a friend with a same computer) :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
close your eyes
think of the scariest thing ever
say the name of your crush
if you like your crush will talk to you tomorrow
like before you scroll or your crush will turn into the thing you thought of
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What the hell, this game should have a thing when the other person leaves you automatically win!
its Dumb how they leave!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What the heck? i had 40 castle and a guy killed me with 1 trojan horse...
You guys should update the damage values visually when you change them in the game. It causes confusion!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think the reason morkulev doesn't want to give people a win if the opponent quits is because he might not be able to detect when someone disconnects from the net by accident or by choice. It would be unfair to award a win to someone who discconnects by accident if they were not in a losing position. All he can do is tell players what another player's reputation (see the white flags) is as far as quitting is concerned and let you decide if you want to play them based on their past (alleged) indiscretions.