Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good idea, nice simple design.
better collision than slow eating at distance. big bubbles: too many, too fast. little bubbles: too little, too few.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i like the game, but get rid of the box detection and switch to circle collision.. i got annoyed extremely each time the corner of a big circle was sticking out and killing me when im not even in that circle.. could be great game! :) 2/5 (cause of the box colision)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I love the fact that if you are too small to eat anything on the screen something that you can actually eat will crop up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good game except sometimes the small circles stay under the big ones so you cant get them, also they seem to "run away" from you
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good, but it's been done. The only new element I see is the gradual, rather than instant consuming of size, giving you a chance to still win even if you make a mistake. The 'scoring' is also kinda boring. Still, a good basic game overall.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Because the movement and bubble sizes appear to be random each round comes in either the "way too easy" or "ridiculously hard" category with no comfortable middle ground. Once you start to win, you win within two seconds, if you make a mistake it'll take you a really long time to make up for it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Needs boundaries at the edge of the level. Sometimes the large circles drain you even when they aren't touching. Still, this is oddly fun.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
strangely addictive! LOL I gave it a 4 because it kept my attention and I couldn't seem to really put it away to go play somethin else. It became a vendetta to get further in level. :) How bout some badges huh huh?!?! ::winks::
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I agree with what chip256 said - it would have been much better if the collision detection was more accurate. But the game itself is fun and worth replaying a few times. :)