Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game needs an ending where I decline the Blankenship loan because it's the most lucrative, and give the bad $1,000,000 loan to Iamnekid, which results in bankrupting the company.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When it says that someone needs to make more than 1000 that means 1001 and up.. So if a guy comes in earning 250 a week, thats 1000 a month, decline him is obviouse, yet i still get a warning.. WTF ?!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Dolphinnihilator, a month has more than 4 weeks... Every month except February has more than 28 days. You just said that 250x4 is 1000 and that is true, but months are more than 4 weeks. Please kill yourself.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just to clarify, the applicant that I was talking about for my previous comments was Roy Blankenship. His weekly income was $250 per week, which would make his monthly income EXACTLY $1000 per month.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In relation to my previous comment, if it had said ""Must have monthly income greater than or equal to $1000" than it would be correct, but it did not say that. If you had an elementary school math test that wanted to know whether "1000>1000" was true or false, the answer would be false. Seriously, please fix this developer.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is B***S***. The handbook specifically says "Must have monthly income greater than $1000." The second applicant has a monthly income of EXACTLY $1000. NEWS FLASH: $1000 is NOT GREATER THAN $1000. The person who wrote this game needs to go back to elementary school math.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This whole thing was just hilarious. Either build on this, or go in the same direction with another. Keep it up!
And I have to agree with NetMonster - We're employees dammit, we're NOT the monsters. The employer is!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay then, I have tried this game 3 times now, and every single applicant is wrong. When I turn down someone for low income it gives me a warning, when i approve someone that every thing is right, it still gives me a warning.
The premise is nice, reminds me of papers please, but you gotta fix your system. Its like, completely reversed from the instruction book.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hold up...says to only approve those with income GREATER than $1000, right? Dude made $250 a week, but that's equal to $1000, not greater than $1000. I declined and got a warning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"After all these loans you gave out maybe you need to think who the real monster is" - err... still you, dude. You run the business, I'm just an employee here >.>
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Theres a small issue with the last loan, it clearly says the car needs to be worth more then the loan, and being that the loan is 1500 and the car is worth 1500 the car isent worth more then the loan, when I declined it I got a warning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I get the point, so I see why it's so short. It was okay to play, which I guess is what you get from a game made in 72 hours. Pretty good.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
mostly character driven,
am I the only one were the paper work overlaps the letter?
also the gave me a shitty car I'm gonna sue for sexism or something
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good game but i really want it to be maybe an idle business game. Build your loan company with time, hire employers and so on!! Really good game :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Sorry for all the comments, but yes, I guess we do get a date. Still, it never says which month we're determining by, so I'd have to assume it's if they don't break the necessary income requirements ANY month they should be denied. Also, well, kinda silly moral, especially since, while in fact there are plenty of people out there who really do have to take out loans for medical bills and stuff, it's probably more likely they're doing so to buy things right now that they don't need/could easily wait and save up for or can't possibly pay for EVER, so hey, good thing our character quit, maybe I can take his position. I'd absolutely leave my crappy job in no time flat if it meant moving to a successful loan firm, especially since I wouldn't be the one repossessing people's cars. So the message fell a little flat for me; our character mostly just comes off as whiny.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hold on now. The handbook says "must make GREATER THAN 1000 per month". So I denied a guy who makes 250 a week, equaling out to 1000. EQUAL TO 1000, not GREATER THAN 1000. And yet I got a warning. I think I need to speak with my supervisor about the handbook, now don't I?! Unless of course you want us to consider in the extra 2 days a month they work, but then why not just give us a breakdown of by day pay as well, hm? Definitely have to speak to my supervisor.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ok on day 2 I got a guy that had 250$ a week. Handbook said GREATER than 1000$ a month. Rejected and got a warning. It should be changed so that it says a minimum of $1000 a month.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Handbook says "Must have Monthly income greater than $1,000" $250 a week for 4 weeks = $1,000, not greater than it. Said denying claim was wrong.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
"Must have greater than $1000 monthly income" should be "Must have at least $1000 monthly income". Rejected an applicant that made $250/week got me a warning.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
No complaints about the gameplay, though it would be nice if it was longer or the things that could trip you up were less obvious. Regarding the "you are the monster" message, the game is pretty heavy-handed about the loan companies, but it puts you in the role of someone who is brand new to the job, so it's rather ambiguous as to whether you're really all that much of a monster. I'd prefer for it to be either totally over-the-top badness (could be achieved by, e.g., requiring you to go out and repossess cars while the borrowers cry their eyes out), or complete moral ambiguity (cut back on the heavy-handedness by not having the boss be such a dbag toward your character).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Comparison to "Papers, Please" is inevitable, but even considering the 72 hour time limit on this, I feel the potential for this concept still falls short of that. It's not a bad concept or exeution, just someone else did it first and better.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wish it was longer and more difficult. The people who you had to deny were super obvious (wrong name, wants 1 million, is like 12 years old, has shitty car). Would be cool if you had to look into more detail than that. Other than that just a Papers please concept scratched on the surface. Not bad for 72hours but I'd like to see this fleshed out.