Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Meh ... I've seen many games like these and I don't like them; they get a hold of your life if you want to be really good. And it's always the same : 'This game is free to play!'. But when you play the game, you'll encounter options like :'Too slow? No problem, just purchase a premium account and bla bla bla ...' And when I'm looking @ tomisord's comment: 'The heck? Really? No way!' Making a good game must be a goal on its own, not earning money (sheesh).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wish people would stop making these games. There are already about five others on Kong. All you do is click build, wait, go kill something and repeat.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
that game doesnt fit to kong at all and offers nothing other games have already. Play Evony if you want that kind of game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ppl stop this game is diffrent i ahte many browser games but yet this one is showing diffrence there r 3-D fighting and u can place your walls and building where u want and if u go to the arena u can fight and now lose troops i just plz ask try this game for one hour
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Lockstep80, you are wrong. From the description of quantum leap or quantum jump in wikipedia: "Although changes of quantum state occur on the submicroscopic level, in popular discourse, the term "quantum leap" refers to a large increase (Oxford English Dictionary)."
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_leap
Sorry, but i have to say it. Greetings from spain :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is annoying by just the fact that it exists, it follows the same MMO format that has been rehashed and served to the gaming community again and again. This is obviously a quick grab for cash, and is annoying in it's being so. I would say this is stolen by the lack of any new matrial being offered to us that isn't already being offered by Envoy, Jagex's newest game War of Legends, or facebook's Envoy 2. In fact I would say they are much better as they offer a much smoother start up (I got 3 error messages before I could get in), much better features, are all cheaper, and all have a large and strong game community to add much needed competitiveness to the normally dull and slow gameplay. All have been updating and changing to demands for a long time, why would you think you could quickly cheat your way into their already boring market?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's one thing to say your game is fun and to tout its features. It's another thing to proclaim over and over that your game is the greatest thing to happen to web games. With a description like that, you're just BEGGING your players to be disappointed.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
In the tutorial, when you're equipping the sabre. On the egyptian side at least, it says "Click your character's portrait and select 'View'." What it should say is "Click your character portrait and select 'Check'."
There is no view.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
some nice graphics but i found it bit 'over done' with too many objects of the game just shoved in making it needlessly more complicated.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Not much of a "leap" ive seen this in like 10 other games, there's nothing special about this one. It's the same thing with a different name >.>
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Please greg, don't put badges on this game... 1: there are allready enough badges on MMO's, 2: people who play games for badges will only rate it down. I hope that, if it reaches the top comments, greg will read this.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@TheShoxter, totally agree. This concept has been made by so many, and until you could create a unique and exciting feature, this is only going to be considered repetitive.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
As soon as I saw that they were using the double-headed eagle as the symbol of Rome, I quit. If you're going to make a game about classical antiquity, do it right.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wow. This is like TOTALLY IDENTICAL to a couple of dozen other games. But they have added a sluggish interface. What a Quantum leap! (Do you suppose they know the guy in 'Quantum Leap' was always going backwards?)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this is bullshit did they even go to history class i can see if you are a roman you control all of eroupe whil the romans only controlled half of it and all the land around the adrian sea oh and the map is bad it looks like denmark is twice the size it is supossed to be
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I must say, I'm proud of Snail for this one. I figured I would play for a couple minutes just to see what they had improved from Heroes of Gaia, and then 3 hours later I was still at it. Go Snail go!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Wow another game where all the females have massive breasts and show plenty of clevage.... The game is so innovative and new they need to appeal to perverts.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Indeed, I have seen more than my share of the "free to lose" genre assembly-line production games, they really are all the same, it's old and worn out, try making something else.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I understand everyone wants to make a cool browser MMO type game, but it gets a little out of hand. I have seen countless games like this that are all the same thing, build buildings, wait an hour, and do it again. Also, they don't seem very polished, and is very hard to play, because it requires so much time to manage and build everything. If you want to make an MMO browser game, make sure that you have features that are unique to your game, and blow the others out of the water. Also make sure the game is accessible and fun to everyone, not just people who play the game all of the time and have massive armies.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@boyman, please learn that the amount of zeroes behind a number actually matters, he said 12,000 kreds, not 1,200 kreds.