Under rating threshold (hideshow)
for all the people that think this games sucks because it is so hard, you are only half right. Being to hard means you can't play more levels, so you can't have any fun. But being hard isn't the only thing you should rate a game on. So i think the solution would be to make a level selection screen and every level completed would have a green checkmark.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
GUYS SHUT UP YOUR JUST SAYING THIS GAME SUXS CUASE YOU CANT BEAT IT WELL GUESS WHAT THATS WHY ITS NAMED WORLDS HARDEST GAME DEAL WITH IT YOU NOOBS
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
fine Game, Liked the first one more though, the "hit detect" (collision check) is rather bad though... the first one is like 2x times better
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i could only get 2 lvl 9 w/ 116 deaths. SIGN HERE IF YOU THINK THIS GAME NEEDS HIGH SCORES Guitarded25x, (do not copy this or the first thing i said)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Excelent. very frustating but tottaly awesome. 4/5. I've noticed that the collisions for the corners of your square are off.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this game is just not fun it may be hard but not fun and i thought that, that is what we were trying to do here??? 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Firstly I question the statement "this is a game". A game by my definition is always winnable and I really don't think that this is. A game also should have a game over screen and this one doesn't... in fact the only way to lose seems to be to give up. Secondly I question whether this is infact "the world's hardest game". If it really was "the world's hardest game" there'd be a time limit and a death limit. And thirdly I question the motives behind the making of this game... after all, if you were one of those people who won't stop a game untill they beat it then wouldn't you go insain? all in all a verry questionable game **