Under rating threshold (hideshow)
regarding cheating scores: it is simple to calculate the maximum possible score. I don't think it is possible to complete any level without using at least one block, and thus you have a ready-made upper limit, and I think avatar for Pedalmania calculated that at 1461, so anything above this is clearly a cheat. Furthermore, once you have gotten a Perfect on every level, the only difference will come from the number of blocks used, and since each unused block counts as 3 towards the total score, at some point all scores (and all top scores) will be a multiple of 3 from this maximum possible. So the current All-Time champ Ganging is failing on both counts -- score is too high, and is not a multiple of three from the max possible. For this second reason, all those with scores of 1270 are cheats... provably.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Update for 3-3 Fill in your score if it's higher. Repost and thumbs up so we can decide on the highscore. (1) 12+23+21. (2) 21+16+17. (3) 40+35+44. (4) 15+23+22. (5) 10+13+19. (6) 17+17+23. (7) 16+12+20. (8) 31+21+16. (9) 20+29+19. (10) 21+54+30. (11) 24+38+26. (12) 38+44+50. (13) 30+26+42. (14) 33+33+21. (15) 16+31+26.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Visual material to get hard badge: http://www.kongregate.com/forums/3-general-gaming/topics/136599-imperfect-balance-2-max-level-scores?page=1#posts-3009847
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If it was possible to complete every level using just one piece, then the best possible score would be 1461. The losers who post fake scores are just showing everyone else exactly which tool they are using.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
how I hate this.... I spend many hours to get 1227 points and since badges arrived these cheating noobs come over again and crash the highscores lists all the time and in almost every game!!
CHEATERS SHOULD GET INSTANT IP BANS !!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be nice if it told you whice levels you already had a perfect strike on when you go back and play them again.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the level scores should say (best) out of (total possible), so when we need more points to get level packs, we know which levels to go back to.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yo. Thx for that game.
One thing is missing for me : there's no way to know if you've done a perfect in a level. You can't learn by the heart what's the best score ! It would be cool if it is written somewhere (excuse my poor english)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've gotten 1)12-20-18, 2)21-13-17, 3)37-32-44, 4)12-23-22, 5) 10-13-19, 6)17-14-26, 7)16-12-20, 8)25-21-16, 9)20-26-16, 10)24-22-24, 11)15-32-23, 12)32-44-50, 13)30-26-39, 14)24-30-18, 15)16-31-26 with a total of 1048.
By the way, how do you use math to calculate the maximum possible score when using a bomb or hammer only gives 1 pt for the block, using a block gives one if it drops off, extras are all 3, and remaining blocks dont add to the score?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To get hard badge:
1) do walkthrogh
2) redo maps using as few blocks as possible
For me, the hardest part was to find out the plausible limits of levels, that could be reached. I found them to be: {{12,20,15}, {21,16,17}, {40,32,38}, {12,23,22}, {10,13,19}, {17,14,26},{16,12,20}, {31,24,16}, {20,29,16}, {18,30,24}, {15,29,20}, {32,29,29}, {27,20,36}, {33,30,18}, {13,31,20}} = 1005 points.
Hope it helps a little.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
My 1254 score-
1:12+26+21
2:21+16+17
3:43+35+44
4:15+23+22
5:10+13+19
6:17+20+29
7:16+15+20
8:31+33+16
9:20+29+28
10:24+54+33
11:24+41+32
12:38+47+53
13:36+26+51
14:39+33+24
15:19+34+35 - Some levels may be refined, like 14-1, with is possible to score 42 with a lot of luck. Kongregate should use this opportunity to ban cheaters as they are clearly holding the top score with impossible scores, like 1270 that isn't even reasonable, closest possible scores are 1269 and 1272.(multiples of 3 when u beat the game perfect clearing every level)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What wrong with this high score list... completing every level without using any block, you can achive max 1590 points, and this is impossible... so they are all cheaters, reasonable max score is around 1250. Ban them, god damn it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Unless there are extra points hidden somewhere at least the top two high scores are using magic to score higher than possible. By counting the blocks, allowing only 1 block per level and a perfect score on each level, the highest score possible is only 1461.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Some obvious issues with the physics of this version. I am currently on pack 2 lvl 3 and I have 3 circles 'stuck' to eachother stacked. but more in a pyriamid shape. They seem to be operating more as gears than as balls or discs.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When is a physics engine TOO intricate? When you put no effort into making sure the pieces can be placed consistently. The game makes it all but impossible to do the exact same thing twice in a row, which turns fun into frustration. It's a shame, some of the puzzles would be quite brilliant otherwise.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Juze: Please read the credits page, we had beta testers... The probability of getting the highest possible scores via betatesting is pretty minimal.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The background for the game is a picture of the Eagle Nebula in the constellation Serpens Cauda, and it is approx. 39 quintillion miles away. Yes. I am that nerdy.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'd like this game a lot more if I could understand when glass blocks break and when they don't. Sometimes a block falling into another, or even just sliding along it, causes it to crack; other times, I'm able to drop glass blocks--or drop blocks into them--without any effect at all. Seems totally unpredictable.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well basically,lemme put it THIS way... The walkthrough is just purely if you are really desperate to get a perfect strike. For example,i did level 15-2 with like 3 pieces...and the walkthrough uses all 11. That misses 24 points,which is quite a lot. Well...we'll have to live with it. A better walkthrough would be better though (nudge nudge wink wink) but it's an awesome game anyway. 5/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For a list of possible scores, number of moves and their walk-through visit the forum @ http://www.kongregate.com/forums/3-general-gaming/topics/136599-imperfect-balance-2-max-level-scores?page=1#posts-3009847
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Got some levels better then Amour. Adding my highs with Amour I get:
(1) 12+20+18. (2) 21+13+17. (3) 40+32+41. (4) 12+23+22. (5) 10+13+19. (6) 17+14+20. (7) 16+12+20. (8) 31+24+16. (9) 20+29+19. (10) 18+54+30. (11) 24+38+26. (12) 38+44+50. (13) 30+26+42. (14) 33+33+18. (15) 16+31+29.
TOTAL: 1131
Please + this, and - Amour and do the same when these scores got improved!
Hope this help people to choose which level they can improve.