CoreMeltdown's Comments

Isn't anything special... as TDs go it's pretty plain, boring... little to set it apart from other games of its genre. Not horrible but not great either. 3/5.

It's good while it lasts. The surreal artwork is great, as is the music. No replay value to speak of, but oh well.

Very fun, and the ability to tinker with turret combinations for various interesting effects is nice. The seemingly very sudden increase in monster toughness around wave 130 is mildly annoying - a more gradual slope would have been nice, and would have made earning the Hard badge a little easier. 4/5

Having played the sequel to Monsters' Den before actually playing Monsters' Den myself, I'm slightly less fond of the original. It's still quite good though, as it has many of the important elements that made Book of Dread so great.

Great game, though the replay value is somewhat low and it felt too short. 4/5.

Nice game. I'm fond of tower-defense games, and this is an excellent tower-defense game. The Armor Games exclusive content not being available is annoying, but the game was still great without it. 5/5.

I love this game. Well done, charming even. I like the more "open" approach the game takes to map layouts - no predetermined routes, you have to make your own maze. 5/5

A simple concept, splendid in its execution. Challenging and intuitive. This will make your brain ache, in a good way. 4/5

More about sheer dumb luck than strategy. It's "Virus Game Light", and just like in beer, "Light" = poor. Needs to be deeper and more realistic to do the virus-game premise justice. May Madagascar burn in hell.

The imbalance between your cell count and the CPU's is absurd starting at level 10. This combined with the fact that the AI seems to actually GROW a pair and step up its aggression takes it from "challenging" to "stupid" IMO.

Nice game, but survival mode is a pain. I swear, dwarves did NOT hit that hard in the other campaigns.

great retro style, wish it would let me use a joystick or joypad.