Refa's Comments

Aug. 06, 2020

Rating: 0

This is awful.

Jan. 05, 2020

Rating: 3

Cute concept, but barely felt like I was done with the tutorial stuff by the time it was over.

Jan. 01, 2019

Rating: -15

Calling something an Idle Game that can be completely in one sitting is really not understanding the genre.

Oct. 23, 2018

Rating: 8

How do you do level 15? You are forced to put the first person in the chest on the right, but you can't do the skull jump with the other person, so I'm lost?

Jun. 28, 2018

Rating: 0

Nothing but a rehash of the same slide-all-the-blocks puzzle concept we've seen dozens of times before.

Mar. 24, 2018

Rating: 4

See nothing but the play button at top of screen.

Mar. 16, 2018

Rating: 6

There is no puzzle here. There is nothing that challenges, no ah-a moments, no struggles. This game feels like an extended tutorial where nothing interesting happens.

Nov. 05, 2017

Rating: 3

I don't feel as though I was actually playing a puzzle game until level 60 or 70. That's an awful lot of tutorial. I'd rework the pacing for the game.

Sep. 06, 2017

Rating: -3

Literally making the single move you are legally allowed to perform is not a puzzle. This was a very unsatisfying experience that did not require thought at all.

Jun. 03, 2017

Rating: 1

While the overall production value has gone up via the voice acting, I don't feel like putting resources into a character driven plot in a game about moving shapes was a great call... Especially since the puzzles in this sequel felt more direct and less creative and fun than in the original. Enjoyed it, but think the first in the series is the superior game.

May. 05, 2017

Rating: 0

Puzzle solving should involve more than just counting, and that does seem to be all that this requires of you.

Mar. 16, 2017

Rating: 0

It was short, but even in its shortness it was already getting repetitive. The save points were so close together that there was no punishment to failure. The boss fight was entirely too easy. That all being said; stylistically it's great. The music is fun, the art is solid. That stuff is the hard part, honestly. Put together some real levels and some more varied baddies to deal with and this'll be a great game.

Feb. 19, 2017

Rating: 3

Beat in an afternoon -- I wouldn't call this an idle game, personally.

Feb. 07, 2017

Rating: -1

I don't believe level 88 is solvable.

Nov. 13, 2016

Rating: 2

I'm a little disappointed that all the different vehicles have identical stats.

Oct. 19, 2016

Rating: 1

The tutorial is entirely too long, and honestly could probably be skipped except for the first level flashing block.

Jun. 16, 2016

Rating: 3

Super well done, and conceptually something fresh and new! I suspect you're being rated down for difficulty? This should easily be getting a higher rating. Don't let the haters cause you problems.

Feb. 26, 2016

Rating: 2

I have idled this game, training 9 hobbies at once, for the last 4 days. I've gotten 3 hobby level ups. My highest (Brooding 22) is 120 hours total for this level up... That's 5 days. Even if they didn't get longer, that would mean to get Angst to 30 for the Legal job will take over a month. Of doing nothing at all. At this point this game is so hilariously broken I've changed my rating to a 1. No consideration was given to the design of this game, just arbitrary numbers and multipliers assigned.

Feb. 15, 2016

Rating: 0

The tutorial still hadn't ended by the point I quit, at level 7. There is no challenge to any of the levels. It's a very cool concept, but I don't think enough was done with the idea of defending against a catapult puzzler.

Feb. 14, 2016

Rating: 7

I love the message, and I hope you continue developing, but I had to rate lowly due to the puzzles actually being rather weak, and there not being much to the game. There's no innovation here apart from putting a message on top of a very played out puzzle mechanic. Applause for putting it all together, though!