[Spoiler alert] To those who can't figure out the chronology because Eva asks Dregg for help in her diary but kills him (but not really, judging from the ending on Medieval Shorts 3) in the intro: Dregg's help is necessary only if Eva falls and can't continue the mission of bringing down Project Eden. Since Eva is alive and well in the intro, she doesn't need Dregg anymore, and their rivalry retakes center stage. Based on Dregg's and Bernard's state at the intro and the explicit note that the main game starts 8 hours before the intro, it can be determined that the intro happens after the ending.
[Spoiler alert] What is Bernard doing in the park? He's not supposed be out and about until after MC7's events, and the mustache contest and Adam being in the park instead of performing the murders indicates that MS3's main part occurs before MC7.
Final scorecard: Day 2: Enio Phoenixes 2-1 Harmony Harmful (Rightia tied with Enio after 1st round today). Today: Enio Phoenixes 2-1 Balboa Rocky Boas (Enio was thus out of the race at the end of this match, leaving only Rightia and Scion in play), Ferros Ironguards 0-3 Harmony Harmful (Ferros forfeited due to injured player), Rightia (Post Office Burning Fire Breathing) Dragons 2 1/2 - 1/2 Scion Scorpions (Felicia tied the second round, falling down just before Bernard would been declared down). Totals: Harmony 4, Enio 6, Ferros 1, Balboa 2, Rightia 7 1/2 (won), Scion 6 1/2.
Noticed where you inserted the "twin round is only worth one point" announcement. However, this interrupted SwagBeard's answer about time limit. Now it seems like the "Yes" comes from nowhere.
Scorecard after Part 2: Rightia (Post Office Burning Fire Breathing) Dragons 2-1 Balboa Rocky Boas (Felicia (intentionally?) lost the battle round after learning of Ina's kidnap), Scion Scorpions 3-0 Ferro Ironguards (Renato forfeited final round pursuant to backroom deal with Bernard), Enio Phoenixes vs Harmony Harmful (score not revealed in this part). Subtotal: Harmony 0+, Enio 2+, Ferro 1, Balboa 1, Rightia 5, Scion 6. Tomorrow's matchups: Scion vs Rightia (revealed by Bernard), Enio vs Balboa, Ferro vs Harmony (both deduced from previous matchups). H, F, and B are mathematically eliminated from the race to first place, and E must score 5 pts today and tomorrow to have any chance to win (since R and/or S will have at least 7 pts). To clinch first place, R must win tomorrow 2 1/2 - 1/2 at least and hope E does not score 6 pts today and tomorrow.
Scorecard after Part 1: Rightia (Post Office Burning Fire Breathing) Dragons 3-0 Harmony Harmful, Scion Scorpions 3-0 Balboa Rocky Boas (revealed by Eva), Enio Phoenixes v Ferro Ironguards (score not revealed in this part)
The fact that a Social Contract needs to be enforced doesn't mean that it can't be a good source of morality. Adherence to the social contract is definitely a good thing, as it is mutually beneficial; otherwise there won't be such a contract. Unenforceable as it may, holding up your end of the contract and contribute to a mutually beneficial deal is the right thing to do. In fact, this whole "morality" thing can be regarded as a method of enforcement. Now, usage of the word "beneficial" may remind one of Act Utilitanism (I can't spell), but the difference here is "mutually". When happiness is mutually increased, there is no problem with distribution; and if some thinks a deal benefit others more than them, they can negotiate a better deal. Therefore the "happiness monster" problem is avoided.
A counterpoint to Socrates Jones' argument at the end of Chapter 3 that enforcement of the Social Contract leads to infinite regression: this argument depends on the point that enforcement of a contract can come only in the form of a contract (as the example of the king illustrates), which is questionable. It is perceivable to insure the government's integrity by means other than a contract in need of enforcement itself. Take democracy, for example, whose premise is to do so by electing those who protect the people's rights and throwing out those who do not. It is arguable whether this mechanism actually insures the integrity of government, but in light of this possibility we should not accept without further proof the assumption that enforcement of a contract can come only in the form of a contract, which assumption the argument of infinite regression stands.
 "Medieval Cop - Adam and Eva"){kind=icon}
 "Medieval Shorts 3"){kind=icon}
 "Medieval Cop - Dregg Me To Hell"){kind=icon}
 "Medieval Cop -The Invidia Games - Part 3"){kind=icon}
 "Medieval Cop -The Invidia Game - Part 2"){kind=icon}
 "Medieval Cop -The Invidia Game - Part 1"){kind=icon}
 "Sanity Check: Chapter 1"){kind=icon}
 "Socrates Jones: Pro Philosopher"){kind=icon}
 "Cube Escape: The Lake"){kind=icon}
 "'Til Cows Tear Us Apart"){kind=icon}
 "Mu Complex : Episode Two"){kind=icon}
It is in the second part.