@InsaneCardMaster - Yeah following that train of logic that makes sense. Except it doesn't do justice to the argument at all and is irrelevant to the question of morality. You are right that it is a valid argument, but it is not a sound one. In order for an argument to be sound, the first premise must be true. Provided that Protagoras' relativism is incorrect, your argument is not sound at all. An example of a valid argument is: The moon is made of cheese, the subsequent clause, being: Therefore, if I fly to the moon, I can take cheese from it. Nevertheless, perhaps the sine qua non issue of this argument is that the moon is not really made of cheese. It is really interesting, seeing how vital the use of language is in the use of an argument. I recommend you read into Ludwig Wittgenstein's everyday language argument, it displays a fascinating perspective on the use of language. Ah, I'm so glad I'm taking philosophy class because it makes me sound smart. :D
Lol after losing my save data twice and replaying the series 3 times in a row, I actually notice how much easier the game is, 1 and 2 only took 10 hours! Lawl...
 "Socrates Jones: Pro Philosopher"){kind=icon}
 "MARDEK RPG: Chapter 3"){kind=icon}
 "MARDEK RPG: Chapter 1"){kind=icon}
 "Coinbox Hero"){kind=icon}
 "RPG Shooter: Starwish"){kind=icon}