why does this game have a 3? it's clearly deserving of way more. clearly there's a lot of work put into it, and the author is regularly updating.
people's main gripe is the length of the levels. seriously? you guys are really gonna knock off 2 points because you don't like how long the levels are, and ignore the ingenious simplistic yet complex design, the fantastic upgrading system, and a story packed with cerebral humor?
i'd give this game a 4 at the very least, but i'm giving it a 5 to do my part in evening out the bias from people mad about the level length.
Thank you. I'm happy that you like the story as well, I think it's one of the strong points. =)