I just showed you the code. That's not possible. Please point out the line on which it sets your message to a blank message. After noticing that there is no such line, you just might notice that the check for rejecting blank messages is on the very next line after your message is set to something non-blank. Which means your claim is logically impossible. Go away, stalker.
At first i thought you were just being arrogant claiming furoa did things that she never did to cover your own arse, but now you're actively framing me as a stalker? kudos Q, you will do anything to make yourself look like the good guy
No, it's coded perfectly. It's so simple anyone could understand it. Here's a screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/n8i0tvK.png. And oddly, you knew exactly what I did and suddenly started pretending you were muted instead of trying to chat and having your message replaced with that.
Who is this everyone else? I've seen all the global posts and frequented kong chat far more then you and no one is backing you up here. And yes, that is the screenshot 12q posted. Here's a pastebin of global from the past week where i got the screenshot. You can also see a distinct lack of people agreeing with you after 12 posted it. http://pastebin.com/1MGKuWz7
Because I already did and you just handwaved it away despite the obvious proof contained therein? You don't get to repeatedly ask for the exact same thing over and over and act like your never saw it the first time. It's another stalker tactic that's pretty sad. You try to make it look like I'm not answering your questions when I'm in fact just tired of answering the exact same question over and over again with the exact same proof everyone except you completely accepts as proof.
Why would I bother? Didn't you see it before and say it wasn't good enough? That's always the response from you folks. There's no player mutiny. Everyone knows what's going on and what happened. There's nothing actually left for me to answer.
Am i missing something then? I haven't seen one person support the banning of furoa and it looked like the only evidence you had for dancraig being a stalker was his name.
No, they pointedly called me crazy/delusional and tried to deny all the facts that I posted which obviously pointed to dancraiground3 being a stalker (some of which was posted by other players prior to all that in The Devil's Inn). Again: there is no widespread disagreement about the bannings. It's just a couple people working with the stalkers trying to make it look like there's a controversy when there isn't.
I didn't actively discuss how to exploit the stalkers work for my own benefits and schemes, i tried out an exploit someone else announced and tried to discourage killer from Dos'ing the server.
I introduced a few binaries while the red message was there, when the red message went away the bills were killed in committee and i didn't have my clout back.
That's quite impossible for a variety of reasons. I think you're remembering something incorrectly. edit: I just remembered: you were one of the people bouncing between servers, so that's the answer in your case.
These assassins are crazy, a car bomb blows up then on the way to the hospital the ambulance blows up. Later i'm apparently having a speech in my hospital bed and an assassin somehow misses the shot.
And everybody always wonders why they don't just give themselves massive salaries... well, I guess the round of new players needed to learn that somehow.
With the way the nominations are sorted some parties get more visibility than others, perhaps you could sort it by the first people to nominate themselves?
Ideas to stop the zombie speaker situation: An obscene amount of protection for the 2 leading speaker candidates, this might require a limit on how much people can run for speaker so it doesn’t get abused. Allow people to change their votes freely, possibly even a second and third choice that their vote is automatically transferred to should their previous choice die. A higher assassination price on speakers and speaker candidates (maybe applies to the 2 leading candidates?) because they are higher profile targets. Allow a friend to take your place should you die, although that could lead to many complications.
The existing downside of a speaker that does nothing for a month has been plenty to stop this from happening so far. The problem is that salaries are obscenely high, so players with no real investment in the game state are throwing around assassinations at visible targets with no real rhyme or reason. It's a transient problem.
 "Clout: The Game"){kind=icon}
I just showed you the code. That's not possible. Please point out the line on which it sets your message to a blank message. After noticing that there is no such line, you just might notice that the check for rejecting blank messages is on the very next line after your message is set to something non-blank. Which means your claim is logically impossible. Go away, stalker.