I don't know, I didn't like it much. Some questions treated you as stupid, telling you the answer outright, while those which didn't were really hard, as there weren't different ways past the problems. 3/5, one point for the funny storyline.
@Mat2PL The game is supposed to be like that. It's an interactive fiction game. Text and story is the driving force in this kind of games. You shouldn't rate a game badly just because it's great in a genre you dislike.
I'm only 14, but I remember this game. I used to play it on my aunt's computer when I was around 4-7 years old. When I saw a remake for it in the web, I didn't have to think twice about playing it again.
I loved this game. Really challenging and addictive. The reactor's bar filling up ad the need to deliver the reactive bars towards it gave the game a steady sense of accomplishment, and the frantic wait for a gun when you lost one is just amazing. (Woah, frantic wait, never thought I'd see bot words in the same sentence.) 5/5, and I wish I could give more.
To Jeff: This series showed exactly the same you do in slow-mo an the game screen. You also use trial and error and use a hypothesis, but you do the first in your mind, lightning quick, and the second a lot more quickly. Just like you also use remedial math during your doctorate, but faster than a child would do.