Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Been playing off and on for a while now, and finally beat it! Very good game, very fun, loved it! Makes you think, and I even got a pencil and paper to figure out a couple of the puzzles
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think Level X has an error? When you remove the 2 from the E, the horizontal line's total drops to 12, but the game still counts it as correct. It would be correct to leave the 2, and instead move the 0 to the N, but the game doesn't count that as correct.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Actually pretty cool puzzle idea. Usually, with similar games, your brain can go on autopilot, but here when I try to do that, I always realize "oh, the numbers would fit, but I didn't consider the colors" or similar things. Nice job.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Ever so slightly annoyed that some of the puzzles have multiple solution, but only one of them is considered "correct"
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
2\5 stars,good music and sound ambience,bad desing choices(which other comments can point way better than me),you give up easily and just decide to use an walkthrough to finish it because it get´s boring really quickly
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@raistlin212 The row one of them goes in has to have white tiles totalling 3, which only works if that row has the blue 2.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Am I suposed to save my preogress manually somewhere? I completed 9 lvls but when I came back to the game hte next day it wants me to start from the begining.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
it happened again on level 16, had to look up a walkthrough so that I could get the answer with slightly slightly different answers. Go ahead and tell me what's wrong with this answer:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/1085872533250789467/1239886138823413830/image.png?ex=66448d73&is=66433bf3&hm=c89a46c8faef6410071f535c09bd914da8558d2ed01b8c91965315be4bcf3c0e&
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think there's something wrong with level 10. I solved it but I didn't pass the level. I turned on highlight errors to see what I did wrong but nothing is highlighted. Did I solve it in a way that the game didn't want? I don't get it. As for the game itself it's pretty fun as long as you take your time with each level. 3/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
An ok logic puzzle game. Definitely some polish that could be done, and I have to agree with other comments on it making no sense why you'd make the settings effect your star ratings.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
what a fun mental exercise. Thanks for the challenging puzzle - certainly doable, but had to logically think through it all. I kind of wanted to be able to use notes on level x out of habit, but nothing but a positive experience. Cheers!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Fun game to make you think, but problem found in solution checking. Some puzzles had more than one solution, and it was not recognized.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Loved it. One of a very few puzzle games that needs you to actually think.
However, there is much room for improvement regarding the controls.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
And yeah, the 'no mistakes' thing is kinda ridiculous. Particularly on later levels, it's laughably easy to just take a screenshot and then run through it a 2nd time, particularly because its SO EASY to make a 'mistake' with a bad drag/drop.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Yeah, the whole 'hints are auto enabled' is really dumb, having to manually turn them off in order to get the 'no hint' star.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Really loved the puzzles!
Only in Level X I realized that I misunderstood the rule involving gray numbers: I thought in this case you DON'T KNOW the color of the numbers to sum up (could be a mix, could be all white, could be all blue). But it really means the numbers HAVE TO BE of mixed color.
My message in this regard: All levels were playable with the more lenient "DON'T KNOW" rule - but this made it more difficult, of course. Loved it!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The 'no mistakes' star falls in the category 'artificial difficulty', which is a big no-no in gaming. It's artificial difficulty because it's not a difficulty in the puzzle per se, but it adds difficulty in operating the game: double checking if you dragged a number to the right spot and not releasing too soon by accident.
For people with crappy mouses or trackpads, it's unnecessarily extra hard.
For people with muscle deceases, it's unnecessarily extra hard.
This can be circumvented with a "click to pick up and click to put down" option.
However, then we're still not allowed to try something on the board, which means we have to try it in our head or on paper (or on screenshots). In the end we're still trying stuff out to see if a choice would work, just not in the game. 2/5 because I like the concept.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Loved the game, somehow these kinds of puzzles always are near to my heart. Didn't mind the star system being so harsh but would have wished to be able to also just make a note about if the number is white or blue - sometimes that would have been useful! But very nice game and concept. :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Normally i like these type of puzzle games but its frustrating the game isnt working as intended. It says every level gave me 2 stars: No hints and no mistakes, but in the menu it only gave me 1 star. So i cant unlock level X and cant get the last badge :/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'll join in with everyone elses suggestions and say that I would preffer different star systems, and a submit feature.
That being said I like the logic of the puzzles and think the base game is great :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Spiderminty I had the same problem on PC. These non-flash games worked painfully slow. Then i figured out that hardware acceleraton was disabled in my browser. And for the game: I always hate stars in static puzzles. You can replay any of levels and gain both stars by memorisng solution. Plus some of the levels have more than one solution and you may lose a star because of luck. But i like the idea. This is kakuro with some creative additions.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
whenever someone complains without spending 20 mins figuring out the right words they get disliked, WE LIVE IN A SOCIETY.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be better if the error was signaled as putting a number on a row/column where it already exists instead of clicking for mis - clicks.