Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Maybe if the Play Now button would only send invites to other people who had pressed the Play now button.
Or maybe there could be a check box to receive play now invites or not.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm gonna rate this 2/5. It works and everything but it should display the enemy's last move in case you blinked and missed it. Also, a time limit pretty much ruins chess. I can't play when I have 20 seconds per turn.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is great ppl take forever to move.
So I was in a 30minute game and he wasn't moving so i decided to go eat dinner.
When i came back I was only down by 2min.
:D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's a shame you can't play simuls. Maybe then I wouldn't have to wait for the annoying people who appently can't think of 1. e4 or 1. d4 or 1. ANYTHING! GAH.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hate when ppl with super fast computer spam u with invites for a 1min. game. They got a fast computer so they like dum win. -.-
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I haven't been able to play for three weeks. I even sent an email to the sites administrators and they never replied. I'm about to give up.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@g00golpleX: I think HeXray is actually referring to "auto QUEENING"... which probably has nothing to do with the issue's we're having =/
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
well i havent played a game since learning that comps pwn humans in legit competitions worldwide over and over for years. i played those games a long time ago. i just check in here occasionally for the interesting discussions about the game and all of the 10 on 1's and so on. Please start reading with a grain of salt you might find yourself on the supreme court one day and breyer has a lot to teach. "Solved" doesnt always mean "figured out". And ftr i never used computers to help me play i just did a ton of 1 minute games and the strength here is a lot higher now from what i here
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
in reply to 2dognight's Odd comment from a guy who has 1,337 wins and no 3 on the all-time win list, collusion. That's a lot of games played by someone who thinks everyone should move on because computers have "figured it out". For your information computers haven't solved chess yet. Yes, programs regularly beat the best grandmasters now but they haven't yet found a forced win for either white or black. So don't spread your ignorance and hypocrisy around so freely. 1,337 wins is hardly what I call "moving on". Here's another thing to consider: We aren't playing programs. We're playing other humans. Comprende?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Chess is a relaxing game,but can sometimes be annoying when some noob is waiting you to surrender thats 1 of the reasons why I never play on longer than 7,5 minutes... But still 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@g00gopleX Maybee its cause you have to have "auto queing " on...or whatever it spells... try it,I wish you found a solution :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
totaly true 80% of all the games i lost is because i gave up because i didnt wanna wait for them to get to the end of there time
so infact i have to pay for some1 being a jerk because they cant stand i beat them.
so no move after 15 sec = game lost would be a good rule :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I get tired of clicking on a 10-min invite only to find myself in a 1-min game against some guy who has a fast computer and/or fast isp and plays only to win on time. They click "play now" over and over and trick people into playing their games. My suggestion for the site would be that you can only play what you set as your game/move time.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
this should have a feature that shows what your opponent's last move was. because sometimes the game lags and i never see what my opponent did, plus the -time forces you to play quickly, thus forcing you to play a bad move
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
4 move checkmate means that you are a noob playing other noobs. No decent player would allow themselves to fall for such a beginner tactic.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How can I give a game a good rating where all of a sudden while i'm whooping someone's ass, it decides to tell me I have lost the game all of a sudden. Same number of pieces left, except he has taken more of my pawns (ie. I am doing better!). Noone is in check or checkmate. Ridiculous game 1/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Odd comment from a guy who has 1,337 wins and no 3 on the all-time win list, collusion.
That's a lot of games played by someone who thinks everyone should move on because computers have "figured it out". For your information computers haven't solved chess yet. Yes, programs regularly beat the best grandmasters now but they haven't yet found a forced win for either white or black. So don't spread your ignorance and hypocrisy around so freely. 1,337 wins is hardly what I call "moving on".
Here's another thing to consider: We aren't playing programs. We're playing other humans. Comprende?