Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I played this when i was way younger and this game was so good to me that i never stopped looking for it and i found it :D 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good graph, but each lvl too small ! Good difficulty, but a little more instinct whith objects could be nice. A little story too ? lvl bonus perhaps or something like that.
(sorry for my english, not my native language)
Anyway : 3/5 ! ^^
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Really good game. Pleasuring for the eye, relaxing because of the music and very clever because of the challenging puzzles. I'm looking forward for Revert to Growth 3.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I really enjoyed this game, the bad press is from people who don't understand the idea of a simplistic, minimalistic ne idea puzzle game with no physics engine, i like it, 5/5 faved
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This game is terribly abused in these comments. It's not bad at all! The controls are nice. The puzzles are clever and very tricky, especially toward the end.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Good concept, graphics, and music, but needs a better implementation. As stated before, unintuitive physics (i.e. friction-less surfaces) and boring level design kind of ruin an otherwise good idea.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Unintuitive movement of world objects (eg. key staying in same spot despite supporting object moving underneath it), annoying level design, often problems where the robot is too big for the world.... This game is terrible and offers no decent feeling of a reward for your effort. There's no reason to play this.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
v annoying placement of instructions - after a few levels, they're not all that needed, and the fact that they obscure part of the field is grating. distinction of mediocre growing areas vs. stone is not v clear. clearer goals/ some reward system for getting par would be good. overall nice, though.