Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I used to hate level 9. I did not know the difference between a relevant clue and a red herring. But I know what both are now so I got it. Yay.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
IF: I can solve this game
AND: it makes me laugh
THEN: it is a good game.
I solved the game and it made me laugh
THEREFORE: it is a good game
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Got only one false and that was because I couldn't resist saying I'm a happy bunny in the conclusion. It helped I just finished a course on basics of propositional logic and First-order logic.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I think Level 9 might need another proposition to make it a purely logical, non-semantic argument. For example, that
IF I wonder if that's a relevant clue,
THEN the machine thinks that that's a relevant clue.
For all x, IF x is a red herring, THEN x is not a relevant clue.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I had fun with this. Who knew using my brain could be so entertaining? I enjoyed its humor, the writing style, and the arguments really made me think. Nice job, I hope to see more from you in the future.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Logic stuff is cool. This game is Cool. But i'd never made it if i didn't press the down arrow key to see more alternatives to select...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You mentioned something about a next game 3 years ago. Please get to it! I love a great puzzle game about logic which isn't boring and actually makes you wanna put yourself through another, more difficult but also more witty level. Please make my sequel!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
IF I use logic THEN a computer will kill me,
THEREFORE a computer will kill me,
IF i die THEN i will experience another adventure OR endless nothing,
THEREFORE i will experience another adventure OR endless nothing
IF i experience another adventure OR endless nothing THEN it will be fun,
THEREFORE it will be fun.
Conclusion: If I use logic it will be fun.
:) Great game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
IF AND ONLY IF Jack OR Jill is ill, THEN there is a possibility that the other is not ill.
Jack is ill.
THEREFORE Jill might not ill.
The game stated that Jill was not ill.
THEREFORE Jill should be able to fetch the water on her own.
This was not an option in the game.
Logical errors make me wonder about their reasoning.
_____________________
THEREFORE I am wondering why Jill can't fetch the water by herself.
Do you know what goes in the blank? ;)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@silversleek:
That is incorrect. That is called denying the antecedent, which is a formal fallacy. It follows the form:If p then q. Not p, therefor not q.
You can, however, deny the consequence, saying that: If p, then q. Not q, therefor not p.
At the end of your comment, your form was:
P. If not p, then not q. Therefor q.
However, the only way to change your statement legally is to change it to:
P. If q, then p. Therefor q.
However, to get that statement to comply with the data, obviously a fallacy is necessary.
So you're wrong.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
...So I am dead? That seems kinda sucky. You just analyzed my logic and intellect long enough to kill me off? That machine sucks.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i already have a problem with the first option. The correct answer is that if i want the light to come on i should press the switch, because the light is connected to the switch. (nevermind how i can see that in the dark) BUT, the answer "if i don't want the lights to come on, i shouldn't press the switch" should also be applicable, even though it's not. (I tried all the answers out of curiosity, even the pink elephant.) I want them to turn on, not doing this will leave them off, ergo i should do it instead.
I get that it's not "as good of" an answer as the first one, but it still works.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1. IF AND ONLY IF you like my comment THEN you should click +
2. Choose: you like my comment
you don't like my comment
3. THEREFORE Choose: you should click +
you shouldn't click +
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I was having fun with this game... Until level 7, when I had to see the comments to see there were more choices. It's not that hard to at least let you know those options are there. Then I started using arrow keys and it would alter three choices at once, literally making it impossible to complete. Great game, but still needs work.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Logic puzzles! I remember when I took my first Philosophy of Math class my favorite from our book was, "Batman is the President of the United States of America or Batman is not the President of the United States of America." (which was prefaced by 'This statement is always true').
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
SPOILERS!!!!
1. You got gassed in the end
2. The machine contradicts itself
3. The machine must complete its mission
If the machine contradicts itself
Then
The machine doesn't have to complete it's mission
4. the machine didn't complete it's mission
BUT
If the machine contradicts itself
and you got gassed and the end,
Then
you didn't get killed
and IF
the machine is still NOT completing its mission,
and you still got gassed,
but you didnt die,
THEREFORE!
you must have escaped
// Answer : True //
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
some might like this type of interactive book with tests but if I wanted to read a book I would grab one from the bookshelf.