Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Spent a good 15 minutes on argument 7 until I scrolled down to read the instructions and top comments T-T
But very cool game, first of it's kind I've seen and I hope to see more of these 5/5!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For a moment I felt proud I paid attention in my logic class and then I realized this will probably be the only time when that knowledge will actually help me.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
....... SON OF A BITCH... You mean I did all that work in my mind for nothing?! FECK MEH WITH A SPUOON OF SOLID GOLD!!! -sigh- good game though, really got me thinking, it was kind of nice, it was like having and intelligent conversation with myself. We need more games like this.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You consider narrowly deciding that biological law has not been suspended to be a triumph of reasoning? ROFLAO. Beautiful.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
i get the whole joke with the door at the end, but i can't logically prove why i laughed. i'm guessing this means i'm not rational, and i am bad at this game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Got stuck on the final question because the option I was supposed to pick was invisible--but only on one off the tree drop downs. No wonder that final line refused to make any sense.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That was super cool! Admittedly, I had to use a hint on both 9 and 10 (9 was because I was being downright silly, though, and I think 10 provided a lot of intimidation factor with its symbols). I really want to play the bonus content, but I suppose I will have to chill for now (though if I get a way to pay in the future, I may just come back and do that, because this game was just that cool). Thank you for providing us with such a fantastic game! I look forward to hopefully playing more of your games in the future~ [That computer(?) was hilariously sassy.]
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the GMM part was a bit confusing, that what the hell means that the letters are under each other. Other then that it was incredibly fun :D I had 1 false ^.^ That game really proves that men can elucidate EVERYTHING!! that women dont really appriciate :D 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok, sorry, I didn't make it passed question 7. This feels WAY too tedious, like a homework assignment, and there is no reward or feedback for getting the questions right. You don't get a power up, see something explode, or get any other sense of "gain" or "accomplishment" that such feedbacks provide. 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
To be fair, what this game did contain was consistency. IF being consistent makes a game less complicated, and overly complicated games are not fun, THEN this game is fun. IF the game is fun, THEN a sequel will be made, and IF a sequel is made THEN I will not be sad. 5/5 for actually making me use my brain for some of those puzzles by using sequential logic rather than generic click f*%&ing everywhere ambiguity. Keep up the good work :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That was a very aggravating experience. I was very happy to see a flash game based on propositional logic. But the buggy UI and the unnecessarily strict ordering of the propositions ruined it.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Absolutely lovely! My only criticism would be a back-button since I accidentally clicked too fast a couple times (like on the page about a bonus website for any donation amount or something, but I didn't read it fast enough). :D
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A great game in propositional logic! I agree with stinky472 in that the major pitfall that most people have with p.l. is that the English language does not fit very well with the way it works, logically. However, there are certain "clues" or representative examples that help people to understand the asymmetrical nature of such propositions, and how to avoid the fallacy of affirming the antecedent (people understand bi-conditional statements well, but not conditional). For example: If the sun is shining through my window, then I will be able to see in this room. I can see in this room, therefore: (many people here make the mistake claiming the sun is shining, but through this example it is clear when explaining that you could possibly see for another reason, not explained by the sun, and therefore, being able to see says nothing about the sun. However, not being able to see does in fact set the state of the sun into not shining for the argument to be true).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
everyone who thinks level 7 and 10 are broken you are most likely playing in chrome (like me) however the problem isnt the game it is that the option (the 3rd of each) doesnt show all the options to see the 'hidden' ones select the option (level 7 option 4 and level 10 option 3) and click the down key to scroll down to see them (if this is to hard then switch to a different browser)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
FINAL LEVEL ANSWER:
If M, then G=A
It IS M, so A.
If M and A, then not E.
therefore, not E.
If O and V, then not E or R.
Therefore, O.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I feel that I got something valuable out of this game.
IF I feel that I got something valuable out of a game, THEN I love it.
IF I love a game, THEN I demand a sequel.
THEREFORE, I DEMAND A SEQUEL!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't know if it's to do with my OS but when I use the arrow keys to scroll through options then ALL the dropdown menus change.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
4/5 Clever idea to make propositional logic into a puzzle game, and the story was fun as well. Sad ending was all that kept it from being 5/5. At least keep hope of escape for sequel!