Darkruler2005's messages

No, I couldn’t. You’re misunderstanding my posts. Everyone can do whatever they like in their free time (within legal limits), but if you don’t eat or sleep due to feeling it might as well just be a bomb strapped to your belt that goes off, you’ll be a strain on society. If you don’t do your work properly or don’t finish school exams because you believe doing them properly might just as well mean you’re doing them improperly, you’ll be a drain on society. I currently understand your tests are too easy, which may pose to be a problem, but understand working will be much, much more difficult. And I don’t think they tolerate solipsism much in the sense of “I should be getting paid for doing nothing, because it is equally as much true that doing nothing is a good thing for the firm as is working hard”.

Wait, you can eat and sleep and still be a solipsist, because those things are enjoyable. You can not do your work properly based on nearly anything, but solipsism doesn’t necessarily cause you to do work improperly. As a solipsist, I don’t believe that only my mind exists: I understand that one can only be truly certain that ones own mind exists.

Why would I believe I should be paid for doing nothing? My employer, being a solipsist, would likely similarly seek to eat and sleep and want me to work to assist that goal, or he won’t pay me. Solipsism doesn’t justify ones delusions.

Haha, it took you a year and several months before you found out about this again? Frankly, I’ve forgotten, and I haven’t really been active here any more. Any way, I’ve also forgotten most of my (and your) thoughts on this issue. Perhaps I can reply later on, but I doubt it’s going to be very meaningful any more after such a long time. Still nice to see you took the time to respond.

I believe I have around 27 impossible badges. Some are purely endurance (just spend a lot of time on the game). Others do take a lot of practice. But I had four years to do everything, so that evens it all out.

No worries. When I came back to check on the thread I realized that wasn’t a good post of mine at all so I’m kinda glad you didn’t respond. Though I wasn’t sure if you did see it so I figured to just shout you but I also didn’t want to pester you at the same time D:

I don’t actually switch between logic types in the way you might think. I use them in different situations, and most of the times I use them both. Not only does this allow for different views on the world, it allows me to understand the people using those viewpoints, and to argue with them better. I’d also prefer to call myself a religious scientist, not alternating between religious and secular. They’re not mutually exclusive. Scientifically, I discover and claim what is feasible. Religiously, I believe in specific ideas that cannot be proven scientifically. I don’t let the latter clash with the former, and in fact if the former clashes with the latter, it changes. So, God didn’t create the Earth 6000 years ago, because that is a scientific fact. My particular view of God isn’t disproven, so that’s what I can religiously believe in. I hope that makes it somewhat clear.

Thanks for the compliments. =p