Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Have you ever noticed, if you use a programming app to make a game, the developer of that app has programmed an app, so you can program an app....
Sounded alot better in my head.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That's probably the case maddy, but KlouD KoNNeCteD always writes the exact same comment on every game. Seems to think that makes him cool or something. Oh well, everyone has their own ways of blowing themselves to make up for inferiority complexes or short comings or whatnot...
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Really good introduction to programming logic if I could give this a perfect 5/7 stars, I would. Alas, only a perfect 5/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
NO he look sad and now im sad :( i tink tat devloper he keep him in cage all te time and also get mad and yell at him all te time tats not nice and now hes sad :( we gota do sumting guys #freelitebot
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Seeing comments about this being used or suggested by computer science classes turns a light on for me. The one that illuminates why it seems that so many computer programs now seem to be trying to walk off of a cliff for ever, then a short period of operating, followed by more walking off a cliff and then eventually just walking off of a cliff for good.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've spent 3 hours trying to solve the last level with various methods, and with each attempted solution having only a single, yet frustratingly different problem. I would have beaten this so quickly if the dev. had just given us one more slot to use!!! TIME TO CHECK THE WALKTHROUGH D ': *sniffs*
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Amazing game, an improvement over the first part in every way and certainly deserves a 5/5 from me. I'd like only 2 things to improve - saving already made solutions for when I go to main menu and an easier handling of commands, i.e. not overriding them with the other, but swapping if I do it internally in the function.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
LOL playing user levels also counts towards your score!!! Got frustrated after getting to the last expert level and decided to check out user levels. After I completed a quite easy one I got the badge and somehow lit the last level's icon without even playing it o.O
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Pro tip: You can just click on the box you want to put your commands in and then just click on the icons and they will be automatically inserted into said box. Way quicker than clicking over and over and over again.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I can't select Main Mode with Edge, IE, Chrome, Chrome Canary, Firefox, or Aurora. Javascript, cookies, and Flash are all up to date. I'm on Win10 x64. How about you Opera and Safari users? Broken for you too?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
game says 'place one thing' ( i dont like these controls as much as the first btw btw) game says 'now click run'. Yeah ... how about 'hell no' and just complete this level, OK?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The original was great fun, deserving a 5 star rating. This one not so much. There are many ways to reach a goal, this game shouldn't force you to recreate the developer's way.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is pretty fun thus far. I remember the first game being enjoyable. It's been a while since I played the first one, so I'm a little unsure if it's true of both versions, but I thought we were graded with that one on achieving a code with fewer commands. In this one, the limits kind of frustrate me, (like, where it only lets you have like, 5 slots in F1 and one slot in your code and whatnot) mainly because when I'm stuck I like to create a really awful code that just gets the job done and then tweak and simplify it into something better. With the limits, I can't make huge, awful codes to work down from. But, maybe that's why I'll never be a programmer. (I'm not sure if I even got across what I was trying to say...) Either way, I do still like this game. Thanks for the second installment~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice game, i (we) would really love to pick the cmds to put into the list with the numbers 1-9. Would make things easier and faster