Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I am very disappointing in this game, while the graphics are good the avatars can be very crude, as well as there are a few bugs, such as the text boxes not going away above the avatar's head. The gameplay is also not up to par as you can get literally thousands of chips in 5 min by leveling. This is leading to players calling everything and going all in almost every hand, and with the add chips feature if you fail, you just add more, this can lead to a large amount of chips at a table where the buy in is 100 and the chip leader has 3000. Also, the player with the largest stack makes it so you must go all in, or fold, which for players that actually play makes it impossible to not get blinded out. Many times the pots on tables with buy ins at 200 have pots over 1000, with no player having more then a pair, for a player trying to play, this is infuriating. I DO NOT recommend this game for anyone.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I left the table I was playing on after getting to about 80k chips and now I don't have any of those??? What happened? Can you not leave a table? I don't understand, need help!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Could not agree less with the description. The graphics are just mediocre, the gameplay is anything but authentic, and I would be very sad to see if this ever gets above 4.4. The cash prices maybe true.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice graphics does not a good poker game make. Sadly , this one fails (and HARD) because you end up playing with utter idiots who go ALL IN on every occasion. Also, when joining a table with 1000 chips in your stack (out of the 65000 I have been given for free), someone is on there with a 13,000 chip stack and proceeds to bet you out of the game at every turn. All is all, the game is unfair and far more balencing needs to be done on this to make it fun. Governor of poker is still a better poker game than this
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
So it's not just the staring that's awkward...it's the fact that they're sat in a semi-circle so they can all stare at you comfortable while leaning back in their seat. Why do they only sit in a semi-circle? Dafuq?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is not poker, you can't play real poker when you have nearly a limitless amount of money, so you can go all-in everytime.
This is just flat out pointless.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How come you make a poker game, and not only you put a music in it, but the music control is the same as the other sounds of the game!!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What about... 1m chips for 1 gold? Or maybe 2m? I dont care, as long as it would be possible to convert chips to gold.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When there are no more bets and 2 or more people are still in the game. It should show everyone's cards who didn't fold.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Have to say- very nicely made poker game. The one thing I'd recommend is to be far less generous in the amount of chips you hand out. Being more restrictive with chips and resets limits the amount of sloppy play you'll get on there (which there is an absolute ton of at the moment). And let's face it, when it comes to multiplayer online poker, people will stay if the play is fair and fun. Nobody really likes sitting in games where someone goes all in every hand and 3 people call for an hour- it's just something you deal with. I think being a lot more controlling of the chips, resets, and levels will go a long way to increasing the playability and fun for people who like playing poker. Thanks again for the game, and good job.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Just got kicked out of Sit N Go right after a error came and and reset our hand and the next round it kicked me out and lost 50k
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
had the same problem as tuxedo, 05:08, got kicked out of a sit and go game. lost not as many chips though, only 10k buy-in...