The game is decent enough, being a nice variation to a theme. I do have to remark however, if you think it's good enough to be spending money to buy game upgrades, you're mistaken. It's good for a free game, but that's all.
I can only assume by the fact you both insert more colours plus reduce clicks available making it impossible to complete level 4 that there's only 4 levels. This plus the stupid graphic "You Lose" does reduce what would otherwise be a nice little game.
@kor6k: If you're the developer, you should in no way be disappointed at some people giving your game a poor rating. It's well designed, intelligent, clear in purpose, neat, and how to play is easy to comprehend. This game meets every single criteria of a decent game, unlike 97% of the rubbish you see on this site, and I'd suspect that those giving it a poor rating are only doing so out of personal taste, and the fact they don't like games where you need to think.
Ps people: If you don't like games where you need to think, just click away. No need to trash what is a well designed game by unfairly giving it poor ratings.
I know it's not the game of the year and this game is a copy of a very old game (chromatron) but I really liked this game so I decided to make a flash version!
Also I'm aware that people who are not able to pass level 3 or 4 will give me a bad rating because of frustrating or something else. People who don't want to think too much when they are playing with flash games will give me a bad rating too. So I think that 2.6 is not a bad result for this game.
If you're interested in developing this, perhaps you could examine the pet game that was big news a few years ago, and see what you could do to this game to make it more durable.
What Lure wrote, plus bad viewpoint perspective. If you're attempting to make it look as if you're in 1st person view, people can see about 120-130o (or 65 degrees each side from centre), and have a good idea of the ground below them to 45 degrees above eye height. The field visual of 7 degrees is bad, seriously bad.
How did this game get on he best weekly ratings? Seriously. Did somebody spam vote this up? The game is seriously bad (& I like this general type of game).
You really must do something about the names on the high scores (like get rid of them). The high score popups were annoying enough without the language, and I cut short my playing time because of both reasons.
You should have a better description so that people know this is a 'hidden object' game, because the current description isn't entirely honest. Sorry, but I have to give 1/5 for this reason.
Btw @PanisRahl: We've only given our comments on the game, and you've responded with personal abuse. Perhaps you need to look inwards on the 'idiot' & 'arrogant' claims you've made, and spend some time on personal reflection. Have a nice day and think about this a bit, ok.
@PanisRahl: I quite understand that the game isn't finished. However, to present something which appears to have been a 5 minute slap-job and expect us to care is plain insulting to the Kong community.
You can't present something that's functional as a game, just why should we care? You obviously don't.
 "Catrace"){kind=icon}
 "Kill all enemies"){kind=icon}
 "LIBERATION OF NORTH KOREA TCG"){kind=icon}
 "Zombotron 2: Time Machine"){kind=icon}
 "Animals Elimination"){kind=icon}
 "Prisme Saga"){kind=icon}
 "Gravitee Wars"){kind=icon}
 "Humans Must Prevail"){kind=icon}
 "Web Kitten"){kind=icon}
 "Save Your Soul"){kind=icon}
 "Which fear do you want to acquire today?"){kind=icon}
 "War War War"){kind=icon}
 "Forest Urbanizer"){kind=icon}
 "Dillo Hills 2"){kind=icon}
 "Postal Delivery"){kind=icon}
 "Extinct Open Alpha"){kind=icon}
I know it's not the game of the year and this game is a copy of a very old game (chromatron) but I really liked this game so I decided to make a flash version! Also I'm aware that people who are not able to pass level 3 or 4 will give me a bad rating because of frustrating or something else. People who don't want to think too much when they are playing with flash games will give me a bad rating too. So I think that 2.6 is not a bad result for this game.