Under rating threshold (hideshow)
4 move checkmate means that you are a noob playing other noobs. No decent player would allow themselves to fall for such a beginner tactic.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
How can I give a game a good rating where all of a sudden while i'm whooping someone's ass, it decides to tell me I have lost the game all of a sudden. Same number of pieces left, except he has taken more of my pawns (ie. I am doing better!). Noone is in check or checkmate. Ridiculous game 1/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Odd comment from a guy who has 1,337 wins and no 3 on the all-time win list, collusion.
That's a lot of games played by someone who thinks everyone should move on because computers have "figured it out". For your information computers haven't solved chess yet. Yes, programs regularly beat the best grandmasters now but they haven't yet found a forced win for either white or black. So don't spread your ignorance and hypocrisy around so freely. 1,337 wins is hardly what I call "moving on".
Here's another thing to consider: We aren't playing programs. We're playing other humans. Comprende?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hey no offense but Kongregate had to improve the game performance. Frecuently I lose only for invite people or accept people's invitation and theres a FOKIN message that said: you have 2 minutes to move and I don't why.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Hey no offense but Kongregate had to improve the game performance. Frecuently I lose only for invite people and I don't why.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Damn glitchy game, you lose games when inviting people, I've also got random loses, and loses after my opponent has giving me a check (no not checkmate).
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
you know what bothers me a lot? people rating the highest comments down!! i had this one comment which made it to the highest rating, and random people kept rating it down so it got taken off of the best comments. so guys and girls, stop rating the comments down!! its annoying and its all i am asking of you people!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The challenge system is too subject to abuse. Allow people to set Ratings levels for those whom they will receive challenges (to avoid spamming from multiple accounts) and prohibit people from receiving more challenges than will cause them to accidentally click on an opponent who has been abusive.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Another good innovation would be to have the invitation window replace the board while game not in progress and limit the number of challenges an individual can send out at any given time so they cannot flood you.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You should have a way to report abuse. This guy I beat cursed me out and set game to an hour length and let the clock run. To mitigate this, you should set a time parameter you will or will not agree to and have more opponents visible in your challenge window so that when you are spammed with challengers you do not pick the wrong one.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Dread I assume you had a pawn on e5 or g5 when he played f5 (from f7 and not f6, which can't be done in that case). So you definately should have had the en passant option. I've never had a problem with en passant - yet. There definately are glitches here; I've seen my opponent's king disappear then replaced a move later by his queen!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
(Kurab) Yes pretty wild game but black's most obvious blunder was his 12...Kg6??. Instead, had he played 12...Rxd8 he would have been a piece up and his bishop on h5 was still threatening to capture your rook on d1. By the way, those who claim en passant rule is not recognized here is mistaken. I've used it on a few occasions.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Bnakai067
May. 29, 2010
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
You need to add En passant. +
- !
F (1)
Remove
DreadShadow
May. 08, 2010
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
En passant not supported! Way to go! 1/5
I've had no problem using en passant...perhaps you used it wrong
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
There are very strange bugs indeed. I had 9 minutes and 1 second on the clock, the next second it suddenly was 0: 0.
Despite offering the possibility to play chess against real opponents, the bugs ruin the entire game.
Hence. only 1/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I wouldn't mind a feature that let's us check the moves of the game and possibly record them. They also should fix the whole, server connection lost thing; it's annoying when your rating goes from like 1340 to 1200.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
That was strange. I made my opening move 1 e4 and my opponent's queen disappeared. The sound indicated he made a move but it showed none. So I played 2 d4 and his king disappeared only to be replaced by his queen...we agreed to a draw.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
good game besides the quitters who dont quit, they wait & wait to see if you quit, Hughster127 ur right its annoying looking for someone who isnt playing in that list.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I don't understand this game, I was checked and I lost. I wasn't in check mate. I had a lot more moves I could have used.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Some weird bugs on the site. Once I was about to checkmate someone, and then somehow he took control of my queen and a rook of mine disappeared. Really odd.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Why does the list contain people who are already playing? The only people on the list should be people who are not playing that way you aren't scrolling through countless names just to find someone who is available.