Under rating threshold (hideshow)
This is my favorite card game at Kongregate.com, and I can tell that a lot of thought went into creating this game. Thank you, Crystal Squid!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@kactus. I love your logic. I also think the same thing. People will like the game more if they win. It makes complete sense for a Developer to rig a game to win.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
racefan12, you've got a good point there, I didn't think of that. Also yes, prev comment was in jest, as you can tell by me returning to play some more :P
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
the joker adds that subtle 'hey, why didn't someone think of this -before-?' element to a classic game. Nicely done :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nov. 08, 2009
~~~~~~~Copy & Paste this message to 5 other game comments, then press f5 8 times, then look at your background~~~~~~~
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I'm almost positive your comment was in jest, but I'd just like to point out that the type of people who complain about Zilch being unfair are the type of people who would never play a game largely based on luck (like this one) unless it had badges.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It's funny, no-one is complaining on here that they drew the most ridiculous impossible hand ever and that it must be rigged. But look at the Zilch comments and you'd think it was from the comments even though the code has been posted for people to inspect. I conclude that this game is rigged in favour of the player because someone must have got the worst hand ever but no-one has complained yet.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Pretty good concept. It's much easier than solitare, which would make it more relaxing for casual players. There doesn't seem to be much reward for playing harder though. 4/5
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The world most definitely did not need another computer solitaire game. Dear god no. However, if such a beast had to be made this is how to do it. Slick and smart. Reluctant but well earned four stars.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Nice implementation of a "clasic" ... addictive.
AUTHOR ... suggest you make the "reward" for playing harder levels greater (typically highscores are on easiest levels) ... eg bonus at end for rounds compleated: Easy 1k, Med 2k and hard 3k x no of rounds compleated. Also, higher rewards for long runs, esp on Hard (as you can't see what's comming!).
All levels need more reward for really fast play - eg, i'm always getting between 330 and 360, so not really much difference.
Perhaps give double score for card if same suit as previous? (encourages you to try and take suit runs etc)
Also, can we not capture more stats in the high scores etc (eg longest run, quickest game, highest single round score etc - you have the stats, just pass them thro to the kong highscore table etc.)
Anyway, I'd give it 4.1, so it's got 5 star for encouragement!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
three peak perfection without the peaks, a little more pizzaz, and a longer time limit. Still I must say, nicely done.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
dear god i spent WAY 2 long playing this in one run thinger i spent 50 mins and did 20 rounds 0.0 5/5 but god am i glad its finally over! lol (set high score for last 7 days 15th with 90,856)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Agree completely Scram... the reason these sort of card games are fun is that you don't know if you will be able to win or not. It's a combination of skill and luck...