Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The glass blocks are really erratic. Sometimes they crumple from a block resting there, and sometimes they withstand a giant box dropping the whole screen on them.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Well basically,lemme put it THIS way... The walkthrough is just purely if you are really desperate to get a perfect strike. For example,i did level 15-2 with like 3 pieces...and the walkthrough uses all 11. That misses 24 points,which is quite a lot. Well...we'll have to live with it. A better walkthrough would be better though (nudge nudge wink wink) but it's an awesome game anyway. 5/5.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Needs some kind of "Force finish" button. One of the arrow blocks sat there rocking back and forth on a circle for hours. >_>
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
When is a physics engine TOO intricate? When you put no effort into making sure the pieces can be placed consistently. The game makes it all but impossible to do the exact same thing twice in a row, which turns fun into frustration. It's a shame, some of the puzzles would be quite brilliant otherwise.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Okay, it's one thing to cheat, another thing entirely to hack yourself 1000 pts exactly and not even beat the game. For shame.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
For a list of possible scores, number of moves and their walk-through visit the forum @ http://www.kongregate.com/forums/3-general-gaming/topics/136599-imperfect-balance-2-max-level-scores?page=1#posts-3009847
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
The friction is irritatingly high. I understand that it shouldn't be easy but it's pretty ridiculous when a sphere can sit still on a sloped surface.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1179 max for me... I guess it is possible to get a little more, but you'd have to be incredibly lucky on some of the levels.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
1) 12-20-15
2) 21-13-17
3) 40-32-44
4) 12-23-22
5) 10-13-19
6) 17-17-23
7) 16-12-20
8) 28-21-16
9) 20-29-16
10) 18-33-27
11) 15-32-23
12) 32-26-38
13) 27-26-30
14) 27-33-18
15) 16-28-20
total = 1017.. enough for badge, can finally get some sleep.... i got 18points in my last game xD going to sleep now zzZZzzZzz
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
It would be nice to know what the theoretical maximum is for each level, seeing as I'm pretty sure I can't get over 9 points on the earliest level but some levels I have over 40 without trying too hard. I don't know which levels I can greatly improve on to try and work towards the hard badge :(
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
What's with all the hackers? I was dubious of some of the scores, but I'm SURE 11,000 and 10,000 aren't real. 0_o' Seriously, it takes some of the fun out of this awesome game.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I redid every single level over again and managed to get 1152 ... its probably possible to get a bit higher but i give up
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I thought that there was API problems with the medium when I got a certain achievement, took me forever to realize that that achievement was for doing 20 levels with a 10+ score instead of 10 levels with a 20+ score *headdesk*
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I have 970 points currently, I think that the game designer may have made the maximum a bit high (Also the walk through only gives you around 850 points)
but it is by no means impossible to get, it just is in the upper tier of hard badges
grow a pair guys (I have 8 impossible badges, I indeed have a pair, 4 pairs of impossible badges lol)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
ok, i give up: i got 812 points, and clicked "fin" and it says i got "812/950" points...in other words, THE GAME DESIGNER THINKS 950 IS THE HIGHEST POSSIBLE SCORE!
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I've gotten 1)12-20-18, 2)21-13-17, 3)37-32-44, 4)12-23-22, 5) 10-13-19, 6)17-14-26, 7)16-12-20, 8)25-21-16, 9)20-26-16, 10)24-22-24, 11)15-32-23, 12)32-44-50, 13)30-26-39, 14)24-30-18, 15)16-31-26 with a total of 1048.
By the way, how do you use math to calculate the maximum possible score when using a bomb or hammer only gives 1 pt for the block, using a block gives one if it drops off, extras are all 3, and remaining blocks dont add to the score?
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
I got 1001 points. I won't post walkthroughs, but I'll post my scores, so you know where to find additional points if you need them:
1: 12-20-15, 2: 18-13-17, 3: 40-32-44, 4: 12-23-22, 5: 10-13-19, 6: 17-14-26, 7: 16-12-20, 8: 25-21-16, 9: 20-29-13, 10: 24-20-24, 11: 15-29-23, 12: 32-35-38, 13: 27-20-30, 14: 27-30-18, 15: 16-31-23.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
regarding cheating scores: it is simple to calculate the maximum possible score. I don't think it is possible to complete any level without using at least one block, and thus you have a ready-made upper limit, and I think avatar for Pedalmania calculated that at 1461, so anything above this is clearly a cheat. Furthermore, once you have gotten a Perfect on every level, the only difference will come from the number of blocks used, and since each unused block counts as 3 towards the total score, at some point all scores (and all top scores) will be a multiple of 3 from this maximum possible. So the current All-Time champ Ganging is failing on both counts -- score is too high, and is not a multiple of three from the max possible. For this second reason, all those with scores of 1270 are cheats... provably.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
@Juze: Please read the credits page, we had beta testers... The probability of getting the highest possible scores via betatesting is pretty minimal.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Thank you ocjel for the high scores for each level. Although there's 1 mistake, in level pack 3, the 3rd game, you can get 41 points instead of 38 :)
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
If it was possible to complete every level using just one piece, then the best possible score would be 1461. The losers who post fake scores are just showing everyone else exactly which tool they are using.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
A lot of this may have been said, but these are my complaints:
1) The instructions are difficult to read; a straight tutorial would be better.
2) "Level packs" are pointless groupings and needlessly complicate progress through the game.
3) The scoring is also difficult to understand. The summary at the end of a level doesn't help.
4) The physics are positively glutinous.
5) The playing field is cramped. On some of the early towers, it's impossible to rotate a piece and then drop it, because the control point is above the line.
6) There's no progression of difficulty, or if there is, the learning curve is FAR too steep (and I got too bored/frustrated to try to go further).
In short, there are many similar games with physics that feel more natural and are more fun. IMHO.
Under rating threshold (hideshow)
Whats up with slow down ? Whats the point to wait for final piece to fall off when it takes up eternity. Fix that. Kiitos