its a good game but please I beg of you, make it run smoother and faster.
also the "plot" started to become cliche after portal did it (yes, im a hypocrite)
3/5 for now. make it more playable and I'll change that.
this was the best game i saw all day. I love the mechanics. well designed and well thought out. 5/5! with flying colors. I'm tempted to favorite it. I only wish other people made games like this.
this looks like a decent concept spoiled by slow movement and poor control. also those black clouds of ??? make it unplayable. I'm going to abstain from voting under the condition that you go home and turn this into something playable and possibly even fun.
I tried to whisper this back to you but "recipient is not accepting your communications"
I see you feel a bit insulted at my comment on your game. I'm sorry you feel that way but I stand by my statement. now I'm not saying your a bad developer or even uncreative, I'm saying that snake game didn't show it. It pains me to look at that game because I can see that you know how to make a polished game that runs smooth and whatnot but you choose to spend your time on remakes. Please by all means prove me wrong. go to wherever it is that you do you best work, think of something mindblowingly awesome and do it. hell I look forward to seeing it.
now you have a point that I haven't made a hit game yet. I'm trying. Do you plan to tell me that your first game was super awesome and that you did everything right?
good luck on your future games. I mean that sincerely
attention n00b devs. please dont remake the snake game. and if you do, make sure its only your way of practicing programming and not something that you seriously publish. we love YOUR games, not tired and trite arcade games that have seen their day. 2/5 for good implementation
decent game but...it IS mastermind. the same game with different symbols is still the same game.
i happen to like that game. your problem is its really quite easy. theres an ideal strategy and it doesnt take much to find it. 4/5 and keep trying. your a good dev
*sigh* when will n00b devs learn to make their own games.
2/5 for decent implementation. now go think of something that was popular back in 2006 and make it.
yea this sucks.
also its a rip off of this old arcade game where you had to drop bombs from a plane to destroy what looked like a city. 2/5 cause its not buggy
2. dont call this 3d. its not. arguably the background is 3d but the gameplay is very VERY 2 dimensional. nothing annoys me more than getting told that something will be 3d only to be disappointed.
3. finally it looks like you at least tried to do something fancy with z-depth. im not sure what your hoping to accomplish but it leads to a "background" building occasionally being infront of the player.
good luck with your game but as a general rule, dont press that publish button unless your sure its good. cheers.
im going to abstain from rating because your clearly not done. however do allow me to rant in a constructive way. not I will only complain about things that are already implemented, not the things that are clearly missing such as the lack of any form of reset.
1. jumping is....crunchy. it looks like you go up at a constant speed until you reach a certain height at which point you bounce for no reason. its called ACCELERATION. give the character some jump velocity (in pixels per frame rate) than subtract from that velocity once per frame. that way you get the smooth parabola type jumps like in reality.
im going to abstain from rating because your clearly not done. however do allow me to rant in a constructive way. not I will only complain about things that are already implemented, not the things that are clearly missing such as the lack of any form of reset.
absurdly addicting. at first i was skeptical. you crushed that skepticism. i dont usually say this about multi player games but 5/5.
also please make the physics engine less buggy. only complaint