Interesting game, and a good effort. I think that there were other logical flaws in the arguments than the correct answers, though, and I disliked having to ask what I thought were unnecessary questions to find the "ideas" for the slate.
Awesome game, very original. It needs a better AI though, it doesn't take full advantage of its units' abilities. Also, game balance could be improved. Klosian >> Human!!!!!
Nice sequel to warfare 1917, which was already a good game. It would be nice to be able to control the squads between cover - including a retreat button. Also at least two squads should be able to take cover together! Its very hard to protect your MG and officers with only one per cover.
Great... another pixel hunt. Too bad the authors didn't learn the right lessons from pyro 1. Potential: 5/5. Wanted to give it: 1/5. All the mechanics are solid, so I couldn't bring myself to give it less than 3. But its got no soul.
Good game - customization was interesting. Disappointing that the the later customizations weren't as useful as the early ones, in general. They could use some balance, and maybe the ability to choose which to research?
 "Manufactoria"){kind=icon}
 "Socrates Jones: Pro Philosopher"){kind=icon}
 "Stealth Hunter 2"){kind=icon}
 "NoNoSparks: Genesis"){kind=icon}
 "Axon"){kind=icon}
 "The Last Stand: Union City"){kind=icon}
 "Star Relic"){kind=icon}
 "Globetrotter XL"){kind=icon}
 "StarBaron"){kind=icon}
 "Warfare 1944"){kind=icon}
 "Thing-Thing 3"){kind=icon}
 "Pyro II"){kind=icon}
 "The Next Floor"){kind=icon}
 "This is the Only Level"){kind=icon}
 "Phage Wars 2"){kind=icon}
 "Hedgehog Launch 2"){kind=icon}
 "Ultimate Assassin 2"){kind=icon}
 "Polygonal Fury"){kind=icon}