I don't really like it - the concept is not original, it seems like the geometry it slightly off, and it overall has a generally "clunky" control to it. It is kind of mediocre at best.
Is there a rule now that only the most truly horrible games get cards? It seems that way, plus it seems that more and more often only the worst games get badges as well. I have had dialysis treatments that were more fun this this game - and less painful.
The reload time sucks, I can't get off enough shots to take out the greys before dying. I liken this game to stabbed repeatedly in the stomach in terms of play value.
Even with some control changes, this game is crap. Using the keyboard and the mouse in these types of games is just bad, give me arrow keys and key weapons only. I would have given it a 3/5 if it was not for the having to turn around and play backwards part, that just pushed it too far. 1/5
I can't get past level 3, I get to that point with the wide spce, click, and immediate die because the fish won't fly/lacks the power to fly – so I am out of the running for the hard card and the badge. :-\
It won't let me put down ANY of the glasses in the seating puzzle. So I am not sure if I should give this a 1 or 5 – I'll give it a 3 and if the puzzle starts working, bump it up to 5.
I wonder if anything we say here is considered by the developer – I don't think it is. I imagine that if there ever was a Ver. 2.0, it will just be further unbalanced and messed up. Though if they boosted the 10k fun mode to 250k+, I'd be happy.
The challenging and impossible modes suffer from stiff motion and lag, while the effortless mode is quite near pointless since there is no tail to lose apprently, either way it is a novel game idea that basically falls short of real playability.