I really liked it. Keep getting the 'Under-Achiever' and no idea what I should be doing to what looks like the 'better' vaccination award, but still... good game, and to be honest there wasn't much you could have done with Pandemic 2 to make it better, without overcomplicating. A new direction was the best option.
Getting under, or close to 4 mins a lot now... no improvement as yet, but not playing other games as much and concentrating on this is making a difference.
I like it... but. Great graphics and controls, but my fox is currently trundling towards the xth Runestone and it's getting tiresome. Hopefully there'll be more variation later on, but the early part seems a bit too repetitive and uninteresting for me.
Took about 20 attempts for the Imp... can't quite decide what to rate it, though. I'd give it a 5 because it gave me hours of play and it's quite fun, but a 3 because of the extra ball = dead thing. I'll go with 4.
Over to you, sy - 3:41.72. Everything went right, beat my previous best by over 40 seconds. Could have been a little faster too, had my Mum distracting me. Under 3:30 is a definite possibility.
The game's one hell of a grind, and the variety is lacking. But... it's giving me hours and hours of on and off playing time. Not many other games do that.
Got my own best down to 4:30.73... only 14 seconds behind the best now. I'd say sub 4 minutes is doable, with a little luck. Good luck to all 3.59 chasers ;)
The Game Over screen says... 'Maybe next time you rate a game, you'll rate it more on how much fun you're having' - (2/5) - 'and less on how complex the upgrade system is' - (5/5). But it sounds like they want my 2/5 :(
Let down by a lack of quality control (and therefore for me, it lags), and frequent randomness of movement (same layout doing a different thing)... otherwise a decent game. 3/5