Has the potential to be a good game. Unfortunately until some issues are resolved it will never be great. The main issues are a choppy interface, and a save engine that needs a major overhaul. Has potential but at present it can't be rated any higher than 3/5.
Meh. But at least it's different than other recent styles, so 2/5 for effort. Unfortunately nothing really stands out about the game to make it worth a higher rating.
Good graphics, but character needs more to do. The gameplay gets very boring after 2-3 levels because all you do is click 2 buttons over and over again. There's no thought involved, and the upgrades are unimaginative and make little difference.
Still don't understand why people can't program games using arrows keys for movement, instead of stupid WASD keys. People...arrows are directions, W-A-S-D are letters! Geez! Automatic 1/5.
meh, not bad but kinda short and pointless. Still will give it a 2/5 because it's at least different than several recent games. ...at least it's not another boring TD, sniper, or Zuma copy.
 "Crazy Flasher 1"){kind=icon}
 "Khronos"){kind=icon}
 "The Imperium"){kind=icon}
 "Unholy Island"){kind=icon}
 "Wooden Path"){kind=icon}
 "Warfare: 1917"){kind=icon}
 "The Lost Cases Of Sherlock Holmes: Part 1"){kind=icon}
 "Fever Frenzy"){kind=icon}
 "The Tuttles Madcap Misadventures"){kind=icon}
 "The Apprentice"){kind=icon}
 "The Apprentice Los Angeles"){kind=icon}
 "Sheepish (JOGO)"){kind=icon}
 "Bandit: Gunslingers"){kind=icon}
 "Knight of the Dead"){kind=icon}
 "Arcane"){kind=icon}
 "Shield Defense"){kind=icon}
 "Crisis: Crazy"){kind=icon}
 "DisemWorld"){kind=icon}
 "Zayo2"){kind=icon}
 "Zayo1"){kind=icon}