Nitewolf's Comments

Comment
I Love Traffic	May. 07, 2009 Rating: 0 a shame lvl 20 is so awfully designed and basically pure luck. other than that nice game.
Neverending Light	Feb. 12, 2009 Rating: 0 whole-heartedly agree with Invain, he pointed out almost everything that makes this game weak. i would add extremely juvenile dialogue and buggy controls. 2/5
Globetrotter XL	Feb. 05, 2009 Rating: 0 very blank copy of dozens of prior versions of the exact same thing. 2/5
Perfect Balance	Feb. 03, 2009 Rating: 0 if you create a game based on physics, make sure you get the basics right, mmmkay? sorry but it fails (and is not exactly original anyway).
Grid	Jan. 22, 2009 Rating: 0 would be a decent game if not for the counter-intuitive rotating. since that leads to a LOT of unneccessary delay only 2/5.
SeppuKuties	Dec. 09, 2008 Rating: 0 way too buggy controls for a game that relies on precision. good example is lvl 3.
Monster Master	Nov. 25, 2008 Rating: 0 it's unebelievable how random this game is. frankly smashing your hand with a hammer is more fun than this piece of data.
Zilch	Nov. 06, 2008 Rating: 0 it's nice, but it's more a game of great luck and a little skill :p
Distopix	Oct. 16, 2008 Rating: 0 funny idea, but glitched collision detection. i was hit twice in one game by a part that wasn't touching me. for this kind of game that's neck-breaking.
Meat Boy	Oct. 11, 2008 Rating: 0 ok after the saltlevel i have to add bad collision detection to it. so only 2/5
Meat Boy	Oct. 11, 2008 Rating: 0 there are two things that don't go together too well, namely wobbely controls and precision jumping. otherwise it's a decent game, 3/5.
The Heist	Oct. 07, 2008 Rating: 0 the general idea is nice, but that's about it. destroying police-cars actually loses you money since hitting them only once costs more than you'll get for destroying them. it's repetitive. and finishing the mission while surrounded by cop-cars feels wrong. keep working on it, it might turn out well eventually. 2/5
Ether War	Oct. 03, 2008 Rating: 0 yes i get particles are important to you. however even on lowest amount it's still too much of them for me to enjoy the game. 3/5
Swords and Sandals 3: Solo Ultratus	Oct. 03, 2008 Rating: 0 if you're too cheap to publish the full game for free, at least make it without sponsors in the start. there are a lot of better free games like that out there, therefore 1/5.
Microbe Kombat	Sep. 26, 2008 Rating: 0 interesting concept but needs a lot of work to be fun for more than a minute, 3/5. to all ppl whining it's a spore rip-off: spore ripped all of it's five stages from other games, so quiet please.
The Necronomicon	Sep. 17, 2008 Rating: 0 @ptp: there's a difference between some luck and 90% luck. there's a reason the latter one usually are only played by little kids.
The Necronomicon	Sep. 15, 2008 Rating: 0 oh and i just noticed it's partially broken as well, if you're unlucky your creature won't do damage although there's no opponent creature, no invulnerability and no shield. my byakhee hasn't done any damage in the last five rounds...
The Necronomicon	Sep. 15, 2008 Rating: 0 almost exclusively based on luck. that always makes for a bad game concept. also the majority of the concept is very much straight adapted from FFG. overall 4 (interesting general idea) -1 (too much luck) -1 (biased towards opponent) -1 (adapted concept) = 1/5
Hexiom Connect	Aug. 26, 2008 Rating: 0 just like the first installment of the game it's really nice, easy to get into but challenging once you get to the higher levels.
Shadez: The Black Operations	Aug. 23, 2008 Rating: 0 rather boring, another run-of-the-mill game. good: clean graphics, rather bug-free bad: extremely generic, constantly same attack-pattern, annoying targeting-troubles with missiles, balance-issues

« Prev
1
2
…
6
7
8
9
10
Next »