Games Achievements My Kong Sign In

Jestertrek's Comments

Comment

Excit

Play Excit

Jan. 04, 2008

Rating: 0

I solved this game a couple of months ago when it was first published, but didn't comment on it then for some reason. But it's a great game! Not too original, as the designer admits, but what this game *does* bring are a lot of nifty game-play elements (particularly the rocket cell), great sound, and no glitches whatsoever that I've ever found in two play-throughs. A great game! 4/5.

LightSprites

Play LightSprites

Jan. 02, 2008

Rating: 0

It's WAY more fun to play this game to lose than to play it to win. 2/5.

Tarnation

Play Tarnation

Jan. 02, 2008

Rating: 0

It's quirky and original and all the game-play aspects (controls, graphics, swarming techniques, etc.) are great. But the difficulty ramps too quickly and the game is far too reliant on patterns that can be memorized and exploited. So, overall, a great concept marred by poor execution. 2/5 +1 for originality = 3/5.

Timebot v1.1

Play Timebot v1.1

Jan. 02, 2008

Rating: 0

It's weird, original, and headache-inducing to a fault. It's the sort of game that only programmers and perfectionists could love, though. 3/5.

Pretty Pretty Bang Bang: Remix

Play Pretty Pretty Bang Bang: Remix

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: 0

It's an interesting game with terrible graphics and game-play that needs some work. In particular, after you explode yourself, you should get a free period to dodge out of the way of whatever it was that prompted you to blow yourself up... only you don't. Move the mouse all you want, but you reappear where you were, which is stupid. In addition, you should begin a new life ready to explode, rather than having to wait to charge. The fact that you don't? Also stupid. 2/5.

Clubby The Seal

Play Clubby The Seal

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: 0

2/5, rather.

Clubby The Seal

Play Clubby The Seal

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: 0

Concept is fine, everything else is silly, derivative, repetitive, boring, and way, way, way overdone. 1/5.

To-Suta

Play To-Suta

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: 0

There's some neat concepts here, particularly the continuous fire versus burst fire idea, plus the idea of angled directional fire. The rest of this game is just... stupid. Totally random graphics, weird flashing lights, no story line, just a lot of insane weirdness. The game concepts would be fine if they were attached to an actual meaningful game. 2/5.

Dragondash

Play Dragondash

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: 0

Eh, it's all right. 3/5. The concept of helicopter is ancient, and the idea of upgrades to it is an interesting one, but the implementation is rather poor. Helicopter is not a great game because it's far too dependent on luck, and adding randomly generating speed-increasing/speed-decreasing orbs to it just adds even more luck. Which means that skill is minimized and playing it over and over and over until you get the proper combination of a good tunnel and good orbs is maximized.

MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction

Play MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction

Dec. 12, 2007

Rating: -1

Rates a giant "eh?" from me. As others have said, upgrading your outlying buildings is a waste of time, as is really even attempting to defend them. The graphics are wonderful and difficulty ramps acceptably fast, and the idea of putting interesting upgrades on outlying buildings is a good one. But the implementation of that good idea is extremely poor and in the end, the only winning strategy is plain ol' Missile Command: pick a single base and defend it with everything you have. 2/5 for game-play, +1 for great graphics and atmosphere = 3/5.

wOne

Play wOne

Dec. 05, 2007

Rating: 0

Lacks a little in the *replay* value area, I mean.

wOne

Play wOne

Dec. 05, 2007

Rating: 0

Best game I've seen in a long time! Everything in this game is balanced perfectly, from game-play to difficulty to areas that are just challenging enough to get to to be tough, but not so challenging as to drive players off. It's also original and the rules and instructions couldn't be easier. Lacks a little in game-play value; maybe a level editor? Other than that, the perfect little time-waster! 5/5.

Nodes 2

Play Nodes 2

Dec. 05, 2007

Rating: 2

Excellent game with some cool new features. I'll wait for the inevitable badges to come out before beating it, but I expect that day will be rather fun. ;-) 4/5.

Ultra Avoiding Dark

Play Ultra Avoiding Dark

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 0

Yet another twitch avoider game, easier than most. 3/5.

Meltdown

Play Meltdown

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 2

Clever and highly addictive! Probably the best of your puzzle games. 4/5.

ConFusebox

Play ConFusebox

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 0

I've seen this game before as a game called Net: http://onemorelevel.com/games.php?game=261 . That game is much better than this one, and I recommend stealing a lot of ideas from it, most particularly the "Lock" button and the ability to set grid sizes. In addition, "Moves" needs to reset to 0 every time a new game begins (if you win, it doesn't). Look forward to a new version!

Poker Patience

Play Poker Patience

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 0

Cute idea! 3/5.

Double Twelve Solitaire

Play Double Twelve Solitaire

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: -1

Far too easy. If you play the game with any logic at all, you'll win easily. 3/5.

Bubbles 2

Play Bubbles 2

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 0

Controls are a little slow... no, make that a lot slow. Makes things really hard to control. 3/5.

Beetlewars

Play Beetlewars

Nov. 27, 2007

Rating: 0

Very very clever! If it has a disadvantage, it's how repetitive the game is, not because the levels are repetitive (they're not) but because you have to replay lots of the levels over and over and over and OVER again in order to get the money you need to buy the equipment you need to survive the higher levels. Still, great game, great graphics, cool design. 4/5.

Developers Players Support YouTube TikTok X (Twitter) LinkedIn
Join the conversation Join Discord
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Code of Conduct
© 2025 Kongregate